Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Sat, 17 August 2013 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9295F21F92B8 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34HNs+4Ad7hO for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E0B21F8A53 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUg/fxhcTn2fQbLbshFlFhCLJoSGN6j8B@postini.com; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:39 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17BB1B823F for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647C819005D; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:40:24 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Thread-Topic: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
Thread-Index: AQHOmzCuzJeY/++0aEaqtFKDs/PWW5maFVKAgAAHswCAAAxjAIAAAwiAgAALuYCAABe0gIAAAxsA
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:40:24 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259F95@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <CAJgsEzVK1E-RYDo4kGnxeueOqyDOyXz7AeMAXysBTnko_pu4ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmDk8mE11Qbz3mLq1Ef_itukTzCCDBtkNZJ0XCz6HVyB2AZaw@mail.gmail.com> <520FB278.9050609@dcrocker.net> <520FBCDC.6080808@nomountain.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259D6B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHTQrT+jgFMhjuqgUxv7LUo804Z1G=ZTy4ddo5YUJSgvSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHTQrT+jgFMhjuqgUxv7LUo804Z1G=ZTy4ddo5YUJSgvSw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <BA98F29596A3674A97C3B463624563B5@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<87attendees@ietf.org>" <87attendees@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:40:46 -0000

On Aug 17, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote:
> I thought I was the only one who thought when the Orlando announcement
> came out "Oh great.  I get to go to Orlando during Spring Break."

For me, it was just "oh no, not again!"

FWIW, Orlando seemed to have improved since the previous time we went there, but it was still not a good choice, and I hope we can make it a point never to go there again.