IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] Orlando (was IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Sat, 17 August 2013 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCD011E820B for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 14:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsQe5QQaAcED for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 14:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA1D11E824A for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 14:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=453; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1376776457; x=1377986057; h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=0RHrUG3YM1ipIRpcs1tiWx+9kMmRpN3ie+42rct35B4=; b=fpxgnqKEqiM/scG1C0eIUDFWp1o4hpiBJAA/tlPiqXdvVV5OAsRJzwJO C0D8TQihHzVKIDRHvI6liV/FE7s6eN7DqBoxosUDbLQ74BPNBe/S+/++Z QfE+MeicSa8nuFmgkv7cjyuHU+PreD+SFBQv3ErTsRCeZwPlLu2yx7wbB k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am4FAOnvD1KrRDoH/2dsb2JhbABbgwasTpNlgSEWdIIkAQEBAwE6PwULC0ZXBogdBbctkGAHhBIDiS2UYIssgzwc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,903,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="86843683"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2013 21:54:16 +0000
Received: from [10.27.1.132] (sjc-ole-8913.cisco.com [10.27.1.132]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7HLsF0n008605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:54:15 GMT
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 14:54:11 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259F95@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1308171449500.83039@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
References: <CAJgsEzVK1E-RYDo4kGnxeueOqyDOyXz7AeMAXysBTnko_pu4ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmDk8mE11Qbz3mLq1Ef_itukTzCCDBtkNZJ0XCz6HVyB2AZaw@mail.gmail.com> <520FB278.9050609@dcrocker.net> <520FBCDC.6080808@nomountain.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259D6B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHTQrT+jgFMhjuqgUxv7LUo804Z1G=ZTy4ddo5YUJSgvSw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259F95@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "<87attendees@ietf.org>" <87attendees@ietf.org>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] Orlando (was IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:54:25 -0000

On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, Ted Lemon wrote:

> For me, it was just "oh no, not again!"
> 
> FWIW, Orlando seemed to have improved since the previous time we 
> went there, but it was still not a good choice, and I hope we can 
> make it a point never to go there again.
> 

Or perhaps make it a point to not have the meeting location decided by 
another organization, in this case the IEEE, with which we wanted to
co-locate (IESG wish).

Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email