IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] Orlando (was IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Sun, 18 August 2013 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9805011E80E4 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTQ+OQq0Kiqf for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD211E8100 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7ICFxH7002139 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:15:59 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r7ICFxH7002139
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1376828160; bh=oQDerrtEwImDGJntPock7VBZrX8=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=TCB1Xp4XLE/OHz0ACIAFI8vTkXRxJdGa5HYcFJ/gbcJPjaYuQg9LOj1GzxiW3aW+m gdSWhYWMlnSR9KtB6kVTRSix15TAvvy/uR/AI23SfBF4Dwp4R/nnPCWuFUA8cev7f0 Pje6Ia/T2x4tjaYH8j3P6PPtbgf0LW4RvyOWaxDU=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p7HDFx0544545964hX ret-id none; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:15:59 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7ICEeOC008085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:14:41 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308172345340.43491@joyce.lan>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:14:46 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|31b101b685580796104c15fbba9d8e2fp7HDFx03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4084BF32-B1F9-413A-A0F2-0244D731C814@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <CAJgsEzVK1E-RYDo4kGnxeueOqyDOyXz7AeMAXysBTnko_pu4ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmDk8mE11Qbz3mLq1Ef_itukTzCCDBtkNZJ0XCz6HVyB2AZaw@mail.gmail.com> <520FB278.9050609@dcrocker.net> <520FBCDC.6080808@nomountain.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259D6B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHTQrT+jgFMhjuqgUxv7LUo804Z1G=ZTy4ddo5YUJSgvSw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259F95@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1308171449500.83039@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077525A187@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308172345340.43491@joyce.lan> <4084BF32-B1F9-413A-A0F2-0244D731C814@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p7HDFx054454596400; tid=p7HDFx0544545964hX; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r7ICFxH7002139
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [87attendees] Orlando (was IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:16:04 -0000

On 18 Aug 2013, at 04:48, "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>>> Or perhaps make it a point to not have the meeting location decided by
>>> another organization, in this case the IEEE, with which we wanted to
>>> co-locate (IESG wish).
> 
> There's nothing wrong with co-locating, so long as it's in a place where we would otherwise be willing to go.
> 
> If some future meeting of the IEEE were in Vancouver or Berlin, in one of the hotels we've used, I expect we wouldn't see many objections to co-lo.

I agree. Hopefully the lesson has been learnt from Orlando.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email