Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review

Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Thu, 15 August 2013 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F66321E8167 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CH+LhDeXHqh for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x231.google.com (mail-ve0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE0B21E8160 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cz11so645664veb.22 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BYxEXx4ZqQgY3/F1v3vI4C8JdFp8ZR2UEUi06huQl1M=; b=hFPjRwveoXSHuGOcMRUB4r326Pw+N2OMbWcJdOaPXya4tPULKcHdxn85MRioYur8Yj CMkwQuGUywGilAZzK9jo0ntHfHY2vpiNDYjWbaoSJ8AhNjMNz9UVssGpJPMXOKlaiR6y 17MtBeh1J/lCNQUXb0m4dud4aSeAVz6SyOINiLUbIO+xKnRO5QPbDX/QIssV0WxVgx6u cE4xz1FPW4HvA2pzgUptL3AIBC21WtcnUJ4UoiiMoieyPkCor4Yrkx7ak6XHMLgJq49U N0r5pARa9yztNmMJAt6yLx8pkZBYvsxCcLfNkkrXZ9pnbOcCvoUSSdoc2krzlmdVttcA txUA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.69.71 with SMTP id y7mr494865vci.40.1376580122121; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.74.97 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 08:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1DE0D0DF-A90C-4B27-804D-FEBA8098BCD4@ericsson.com>
References: <C4413723-4E83-44D8-967D-C61564F33843@isoc.org> <CAKKJt-dCsJKzkuWmtPYaLct_9zzbe2HCXBB52QNerC4hHKaqWQ@mail.gmail.com> <9D5C64C2-1187-42A7-B237-8AAEC4810D57@isoc.org> <D1CEAB47-2B80-4FA9-9B18-C018BF10E794@checkpoint.com> <20130814153327.GK3865@mx1.yitter.info> <CAH1iCipcmf6baef+Ehys-OCQ1E6AqStCxYXDDJS8TLW1z+G=_Q@mail.gmail.com> <60958B6B-A77C-4A83-A5CD-336432DBA8D7@ericsson.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308150927240.39997@joyce.lan> <1DE0D0DF-A90C-4B27-804D-FEBA8098BCD4@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:22:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CABmDk8khtpgSSeV9RJOsjKYqXso_s0pEKF4ax+bTGjLhcbQPng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a84522f789304e3fe0908
Cc: "87attendees@ietf.org" <87attendees@ietf.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:22:15 -0000

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>wrote;wrote:

> Don't book more people than rooms.
>
[MB] The hotels book based on anticipated a specific number/percentage of
no shows - that's standard business practice and is not unlike what the
airlines do. Andrew Sullivan provided all the detail as to how it works
based on his own firsthand experiences.   I do wonder if the numbers vary
for conferences as to the average public.  I would think the IETF no show
rate, for example, might be lower than the average no show rate.   My guess
also is that they had more people from the other conference extend their
stays.  As someone else noted, they aren't going to kick someone out of a
room - that's guaranteed revenue. There's always a chance there will be no
shows - flight delays, illness, etc.    [/MB]

If a booked person doesn't show, let the hotel charge that person a
> cancellation fee to cover revenue lost due to empty rooms.
>
[MB] They already do that - you can find any reservation has a cancel by
date/time. If you don't cancel by then, they will charge you the first
nights rate. [/MB]

>
> --
> Jakob Heitz.
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2013, at 6:28 AM, "John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
> >> Don't bump anyone.  Apply a cancelation fee.
> >
> > Not an option.  If the hotel has more people than rooms, they have to
> bump someone, and there's no way to force a person who's checked into a
> room out of it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> > "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
> > _______________________________________________
> > 87attendees mailing list
> > 87attendees@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees
> _______________________________________________
> 87attendees mailing list
> 87attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees
>