Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> Thu, 15 August 2013 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F221F9AC4 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cOeehCBZkHT6 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [IPv6:2607:f4b8:3:0:218:71ff:fe83:66b9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F85F21F99CD for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89FA62AA9; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IYcnCxTjAXLr; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:09:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e2.htt-consult.com (lx120e2.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@labs.htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5D06562A68; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:09:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <520D3568.7090602@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:09:12 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@computer.org>
References: <C4413723-4E83-44D8-967D-C61564F33843@isoc.org><CAKKJt-dCsJKzkuWmtPYaLct_9zzbe2HCXBB52QNerC4hHKaqWQ@mail.gmail.com><9D5C64C2-1187-42A7-B237-8AAEC4810D57@isoc.org><D1CEAB47-2B80-4FA9-9B18-C018BF10E794@checkpoint.com><20130814153327.GK3865@mx1.yitter.info><CAH1iCipcmf6baef+Ehys-OCQ1E6AqStCxYXDDJS8TLW1z+G=_Q@mail.gmail.com><60958B6B-A77C-4A83-A5CD-336432DBA8D7@ericsson.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1308150927240.39997@joyce.lan><1DE0D0DF-A90C-4B27-804D-FEBA8098BCD4@ericsson.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1308151138170.40428@joyce.lan><8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B998F05@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <192EBF07-33F4-48DC-A78D-6F2551FD6E36@network-heretics.com> <520D2B80.4060508@computer.org>
In-Reply-To: <520D2B80.4060508@computer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 87attendees@ietf.org, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, "Fred Baker \(fred\)" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 20:09:33 -0000

On 08/15/2013 03:26 PM, Charles E. Perkins wrote:
> On 8/15/2013 11:04 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>> On Aug 15, 2013, at 1:40 PM, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And IETFers being a little more flexible. Sometimes I really scratch 
>>> my head about discussions on the attendee lists...
>> +1
>>
>>
>
> +1  --  but I wish the other hotels had great WiFi like the IETF hotel...
>

I paid 19EU/day the prior week in Bonn for ETSI/NFV.  Though the week 
before that for IEEE 802 in Geneva it was free (better have been for the 
price of that hotel...).  Yes, IETF networks are great and in the past 
when I had to fight Corporate travel/AP on staying at the venue hotel, I 
used that as part of the price justification.