Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 15 August 2013 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AED21F9F84 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BISh6tllaAoP for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2181311E815B for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id A277DA1; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1F29A; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:57:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308150927240.39997@joyce.lan>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308151656060.5289@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <C4413723-4E83-44D8-967D-C61564F33843@isoc.org> <CAKKJt-dCsJKzkuWmtPYaLct_9zzbe2HCXBB52QNerC4hHKaqWQ@mail.gmail.com> <9D5C64C2-1187-42A7-B237-8AAEC4810D57@isoc.org> <D1CEAB47-2B80-4FA9-9B18-C018BF10E794@checkpoint.com> <20130814153327.GK3865@mx1.yitter.info>, <CAH1iCipcmf6baef+Ehys-OCQ1E6AqStCxYXDDJS8TLW1z+G=_Q@mail.gmail.com> <60958B6B-A77C-4A83-A5CD-336432DBA8D7@ericsson.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308150927240.39997@joyce.lan>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "87attendees@ietf.org" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:57:38 -0000

On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, John R Levine wrote:

> Not an option.  If the hotel has more people than rooms, they have to 
> bump someone, and there's no way to force a person who's checked into a 
> room out of it.

Airlines usually offer people cash or other incentive to take a later 
flight. So whilst there is no way to *force* someone out of a room, 
nothing says the hotel can't buy them out of it.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se