IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Sun, 18 August 2013 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AC511E80FB for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqRlrbFET8aS for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C0111E80E4 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7ICDJ6V001135 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:13:19 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r7ICDJ6V001135
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1376828000; bh=lPFYNrfSAdxjcC68FKcGW7ijN8s=; h=From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=s9CDXaY019PqMiLiU/xcNjUKbAKv+2DEAnbewaN2O8u96UPHCT9zrvkV5O7yREFav QrXSdZzaMcecX00Hid67icCaJjh4vyhHIhK4+jFf+9HU3j4km7raGx2L/XeAWFlqZv KugjcVQZFTcf8PSq5pdFGnHuI65JAqmfBU0WIviA=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p7HDDJ0544545954ZA ret-id none; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:13:19 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7ICDFj6007938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:13:15 +0100
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD11BA2B-9DC1-426A-BFB3-9C44AC3E40B2"
Message-ID: <EMEW3|bab3032ef478727a6ccd2570b8a5f3d8p7HDDJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AED5379E-122B-4CFA-B197-BC585941E44A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:13:21 +0100
References: <CAJgsEzVK1E-RYDo4kGnxeueOqyDOyXz7AeMAXysBTnko_pu4ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmDk8mE11Qbz3mLq1Ef_itukTzCCDBtkNZJ0XCz6HVyB2AZaw@mail.gmail.com> <520FB278.9050609@dcrocker.net> <520FBCDC.6080808@nomountain.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259D6B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com> <AED5379E-122B-4CFA-B197-BC585941E44A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p7HDDJ054454595400; tid=p7HDDJ0544545954ZA; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r7ICDJ6V001135
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [87attendees] [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:13:33 -0000

On 17 Aug 2013, at 20:04, Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> 
> I always thought Minneapolis in winter was a good choice—it's a lovely city, but not really a winter city, so you get convenient food _and_ nobody goes just for the fun of it.
> [MB] I agree 100%.  Minneapolis meets all of our needs in terms of an effective and efficient place to get work done.  [/MB] 

Minneapolis was a great venue. Is there a particular reason it's dropped off the meeting schedule?

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email