IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was Re: [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)

John Bradley <jbradley@pingidentity.com> Fri, 16 August 2013 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jbradley@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3001C11E81AB for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUBfS8pMLMtU for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog108.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog108.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1ECF21F99FA for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob108.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUg5Re9FpIjBii46Rv178EaEaJu1Y8ctl@postini.com; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:18 PDT
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 9so3687683iec.21 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=pAb/ik7avbqs+RzoO1MTOhRBrDzTWNQhxsF5kWy15rw=; b=Gi6CtH6j7ZHj087zKHndvKALtt6G6xWmIP+HUiCdWADAsjdXvX5zbv1HpdgjBt5XOC ZUEDmcj1oT1Pa0ls8C6mJKVIcPcpojGg5C+E3LXMjGVfqyp8uKj4GszKLInBwvrg53rf RgLJ+5lDL1e+wBJXzWgcu6leuwfIae6HHIJLrlBfZPoSFEvK7PGoUPz5AR9HMwloyXfm tDqBnaVbREOpS0l3tu7sc6Fs/ke6qB0XKIlwkxp7gGI6SvIwq4ja4+2xKM6M5pvz24VB DA0BOXpVl5923bl6xDX9ysNJArKEO/mrzbwTTAioKigt9mtfcmNIFDHp8qMSkOGu4Ek+ M1xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmZ2zYSrpS97AQpUBXwnGyKjlnidcyEpHLgVwS5dYSsablAMVOolvnb7wPHrcCaYKF7WRzgk5K0KDjwGJ0BeSGepF4HX+OqIJc5xq+yRRm8Si3FNQ2ub6QXOglARpepDkdbuRo9mvGa4BZCST14VLr9SdciLw==
X-Received: by 10.50.111.197 with SMTP id ik5mr5711881igb.19.1376670069272; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.111.197 with SMTP id ik5mr5711871igb.19.1376670069187; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.216] (190-20-24-227.baf.movistar.cl. [190.20.24.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p10sm11481480igx.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A499A94C-56F0-4A66-85FA-7F3CF044578B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: John Bradley <jbradley@pingidentity.com>
In-Reply-To: <520E4C01.1040102@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:21:03 -0400
Message-Id: <C415F022-476A-403C-B3AC-237E7D04FF91@pingidentity.com>
References: <C4413723-4E83-44D8-967D-C61564F33843@isoc.org><CAKKJt-dCsJKzkuWmtPYaLct_9zzbe2HCXBB52QNerC4hHKaqWQ@mail.gmail.com><9D5C64C2-1187-42A7-B237-8AAEC4810D57@isoc.org><D1CEAB47-2B80-4FA9-9B18-C018BF10E794@checkpoint.com><20130814153327.GK3865@mx1.yitter.info><CAH1iCipcmf6baef+Ehys-OCQ1E6AqStCxYXDDJS8TLW1z+G=_Q@mail.gmail.com><60958B6B-A77C-4A83-A5CD-336432DBA8D7@ericsson.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1308150927240.39997@joyce.lan><1DE0D0DF-A90C-4B27-804D-FEBA8098BCD4@ericsson.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1308151138170.40428@joyce.lan><8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B998F05@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <192EBF07-33F4-48DC-A78D-6F2551FD6E36@network-heretics.com> <520D2B80.4060508@computer.org> <520D39DA.2020301@lacnic.net> <8C3F6CE1-DA90-475B-974D-6B21BE56B099@nominum.com> <520E4C01.1040102@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: '87 attendees' <87attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] SIM purchase at the IETF (was Re: [87all] IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:21:23 -0000

+1

John Bradley  |  Sr. Technical Architect
Ping Identity  |   www.pingidentity.com

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
O: +1 720.306.6055   M: +1 (303) 396-9546
Email: jbradley@pingidentity.com

Twitter: @ve7jtb
LinkedIn.com/in/v7jtb


On 2013-08-16, at 11:57 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 8/15/2013 7:05 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> We've asked about this before, but it hasn't got traction.
> 
> 
> Worthy topics often fail to get traction on an IETF list because discussion gets sidetracked, rather than because the topic lacks support.  Absent a core of active advocates, there is no source of pressure for pursuing the topic.
> 
> When a topic shows up repeatedly and mostly (or only) garners positive comments and isn't very difficult to pursue, we should press a bit harder for its adoption.
> 
> So here's a simple proposal that I will ask the rest of you to express support for:
> 
>     The IAOC should pursue having a local SIM card rental booth at future IETF meetings.  The card choices should represent locally competitive costs and services.
> 
> 
> Yeah or nay?
> 
> d/
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
> _______________________________________________
> 87attendees mailing list
> 87attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email