Re: [87attendees] Orlando (was IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 18 August 2013 04:10 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2943B11E81F5 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wRgXP6zdCF6B for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D0F21F90A7 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x14so5308816ief.26 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S8EoDFkN0ZmtN6K0W7rNnHm0D4XTHy17otknxXbBM6g=; b=Btpt+3HorfXAps/LiBYJpYtradzg44JtZfD+OMLzSys5ofDgLILPGr8uvZ/z5b7ljr 1nmaYgLnKF/zv57zaQG72Qu3/EHdO+tXplw/ijF+tg65rLUhpceVPJt73GJHrydYOMyG X2V97qM5Qmz+CoqcKRqF2CVwnNXWFpj3/JQsvKrR24mL1tNAqE+cGOiG9N6eEj+gSu3W yHOR+9k9xicVr5KGX5dgufRWRiO4cGjCjABjLkhySi643Va+qwZyzo7Uvt/XVjgykxtd pVdnjWGsuOdOZjt2ku2YdWgo5ahHRPO2x4N11npRTKzJqUbeKnaH+D6YJuU4vC5i5PQk UMew==
X-Received: by 10.42.30.200 with SMTP id w8mr2176257icc.24.1376799053236; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.30] (70-3-16-11.pools.spcsdns.net. [70.3.16.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p10sm7741808igx.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 21:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52104948.4020705@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 23:10:48 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <CAJgsEzVK1E-RYDo4kGnxeueOqyDOyXz7AeMAXysBTnko_pu4ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmDk8mE11Qbz3mLq1Ef_itukTzCCDBtkNZJ0XCz6HVyB2AZaw@mail.gmail.com> <520FB278.9050609@dcrocker.net> <520FBCDC.6080808@nomountain.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259D6B@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CABmDk8=+Nke05KED3Lrp2wzyQ2yy1BgYbgfPkRkeDwQ6s-zWFA@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHTQrT+jgFMhjuqgUxv7LUo804Z1G=ZTy4ddo5YUJSgvSw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630775259F95@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1308171449500.83039@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077525A187@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308172345340.43491@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308172345340.43491@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<87attendees@ietf.org>" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] Orlando (was IETF 87 Berlin Meeting Review)
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 04:10:54 -0000

On 8/17/2013 10:48 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>>> Or perhaps make it a point to not have the meeting location decided by
>>> another organization, in this case the IEEE, with which we wanted to
>>> co-locate (IESG wish).
>
> There's nothing wrong with co-locating, so long as it's in a place 
> where we would otherwise be willing to go.
>
> If some future meeting of the IEEE were in Vancouver or Berlin, in one 
> of the hotels we've used, I expect we wouldn't see many objections to 
> co-lo.

We co-lo-ed (!) in Vancouver for IETF 64 in 2005. I stayed for IEEE 
802.1 meetings the following week.

It can be done.

Spencer