IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless

Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com> Sat, 10 August 2013 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dch@jsonified.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744F611E80D5 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.356
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-MQCad2JdgW for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE2F11E80D7 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id o10so3952850lbi.40 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jsonified.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0UXfDfrmUCkDj1SV4v1+zJr0MSkU47GovfyMGuC22g0=; b=s627JsK/+sN22OnimwP1ETMZjiu8l4+S3uvkNKH9M/tSk29AXRrVWDcRowTeXgnJ50 TH4X3/I3WCYraDt23JNA+tA5s8YGkOz10K67yfkvyrRc0jPKw4DaYImEUvDb1xGvTlxY SL7D/NOtqIfWCCAEP48/eg52g0J2FrW2n5KYo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0UXfDfrmUCkDj1SV4v1+zJr0MSkU47GovfyMGuC22g0=; b=EW//wQ6wSaw/xDOQ37UPIBP6Pelt8qPdtQivskIGpkWl3to4Hn3XWBnAt/iGDqyfOH TPQ8KGLb/7FNVvh2dYpOvH0crknc0qpqE2Ctlmi++99+WkYxXs6m0M2Q3ZTzW9HqI777 M8ss0xCnkRyysImjjDD3zlEAEKEVdD7/eiUbW8nH0OoFmfzoIFI7XIvERwF55oNR2tnb KxEJf+NRACNsZE/cNL3iIHRpslbFTeIiyk6c0Ke1ll1Nn3mQtsH8PNxA8pIVSsxxi/2w NIJ69F+qilyBmnuR6UgwXey4F+gfKvVUdtujfcqUYz3A8Zq/0LZ3hxtWt3r49cOSOYaL g0vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYa2sG6vFbn5b9GiKffaLzAnr2oCBwiPy9eayfpzhZqcc4Dhirsh9q9BkPzD02nBQm7iJk
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.115.176 with SMTP id jp16mr6076859lab.17.1376171927533; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.70.229 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [84.112.19.176]
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:58:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL+Y1nuuzDEJ_g5vzv+U8r38PgZyQDfz25nU1r4j+_VUG=Q8Yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cottlehuber <dch@jsonified.com>
To: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 22:05:07 -0000

On 5 August 2013 11:48, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Others have given the wireless network at this IETF due praise.  Indeed the wireless has been excellent for many IETFs now, such that we pretty much take it for granted.  Well done to everyone involved.

+1

As a first time attendee here was my response: "easily best internet
ever, anywhere."[1].

Not just well done, not just world class, but setting the standard for
others to follow. I was surprised at how many apps and tools simply
didn't handle IPv6 at all, but you can't ask a conference to fix that
:-).

[1]: https://twitter.com/dch__/status/362458818329853952

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email