[88attendees] elevator security theater

Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Sat, 16 November 2013 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@denic.de>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B574411E817B for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:18:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JiRXx3WXj6fT for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from office.denic.de (office.denic.de [IPv6:2a02:568:122:16:1::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C0311E8183 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:18:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x27.adm.denic.de (x28.fra2.if.denic.de [10.122.64.17]) by office.denic.de with esmtp id 1VhflH-0006kz-Nf; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:18:07 +0100
Received: from localhost by x27.adm.denic.de with local id 1VhflH-0003TX-JT; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:18:07 +0100
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:18:07 +0100
From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
To: 88attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20131116131807.GE25947@x28.adm.denic.de>
References: <ho26bf7o.8t9ohlwxci3u@login5-be.medallia.com> <9CC8BA35-DAAF-4090-AD9E-69117B775B53@fugue.com> <20131116100946.GD25947@x28.adm.denic.de> <95B5FEA1-E170-4829-BFB2-F760E4BDA3B5@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <95B5FEA1-E170-4829-BFB2-F760E4BDA3B5@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Sender: Peter Koch <peter@denic.de>
Subject: [88attendees] elevator security theater
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list." <88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:18:12 -0000

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 08:01:00AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:

> It wouldn't be the first hotel we've stayed at where you have to use your room key to get on the elevator.   But yeah.

that might actually be useful, at least for the good feeling.
Allowing the target floor only, or making it the default,
both reduce the search space for somebody who "finds" the key card.

-Peter