IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [88attendees] 31.133.128.0/18 ?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 04 November 2013 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36AA11E8119 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 06:06:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQjAhF1A0GPN for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 06:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B476E11E8118 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 06:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6943DE09F; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:17:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id AF2D163B88; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:06:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC3963848; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:06:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20131104000843.GA19739@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <52769CAF.8070601@sidn.nl> <CADCiYHAO5cjNwoGwTHPsJoiFYcY6KL1X7DsB-1BxWKoGmRVpRA@mail.gmail.com> <ADB75C7A-1CFC-40D9-8104-AF041FDC8724@viagenie.ca> <20131104000843.GA19739@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:06:16 -0500
Message-ID: <17515.1383573976@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, "88attendees@ietf.org" <88attendees@ietf.org>, Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>, "Marco Davids (SIDN)" <marco.davids@sidn.nl>
Subject: Re: [88attendees] 31.133.128.0/18 ?
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list." <88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:06:35 -0000

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> wrote:
    >> IETF blocks should be geo-registered on the Moon,

    > A few RTT tests would show to anyone that it is a lie. We should find
    > something more credible.

Just make sure that the names on the reverse includes mention of Colorado Springs,
and stargate.ietf.net.

Alternatively, we could simply insert a delay line, and dogfood some of our delay
tolerant protocols...

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email