Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators
Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 02 November 2013 21:48 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 13E3021E80E9 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E+xeW+k5sIXK for
<88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
30A3C21E80B7 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id kp14so5450859pab.32 for
<88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=QQVFHB2WXnN8/UQRy+RxoYPZvqOurlSNPaa45axmuMw=;
b=wXYZjSNszpvdKxUIX+CcHEFeiOz7pAJ3+FRVeGxqiUZ/pxqZEfnh9ie5vbUHlu/l3r
XfvGhiVZcWZVyxsTt76xlwE91vYA2ya52u5gjZ2x5oLcHoIBfXCsnP/KOEmhzTS5Nebe
oJaJpo/ZNUXW7KrGN2YEOlO2gyUj+7ix9I8QbmpO6ZBg2qkrcc2FcB6H3Z0ZFNskBR0z
YaqbmRgyDYLrA9mOpQBiIyDQ/dILt0ZM5SMg/Gcw2IWHfLQnBTtyAkwBksGAPjNrpVSV
kSoCktvo3lZSTQ0KydkKF1lZ1vxgCmhh59rG1e8H8goyZgOqaMSQw2dxcUxhMvLru0W7 Uvag==
X-Received: by 10.67.1.101 with SMTP id bf5mr9659235pad.50.1383428927924;
Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.144.202] (dhcp-90ca.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.144.202])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm18587326pbq.31.2013.11.02.14.48.46 for
<multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52757340.5040507@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:48:48 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 88attendees@ietf.org
References: <CAAFAkD_g_VdmOKOvWAGif-eXF-ve3TpYWMexwC0rVSucW_4x7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAFAkD_g_VdmOKOvWAGif-eXF-ve3TpYWMexwC0rVSucW_4x7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>,
<mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>,
<mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:48:53 -0000
On 11/2/2013 4:44 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > Feels like overzelous, most optimal ever protocol design at > the expense of usability. We either need to come more often or less often - when I checked in, I realized I had no idea how the elevators worked at previous check-in times, but had to ask, because I couldn't remember this time, either :-) But I usually acclimate by Wednesday or Thursday of IETF weeks ... Spencer
- [88attendees] hotel elevators Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Leif Johansson
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ted Lemon
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Colin Doyle
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Leif Johansson
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ted Lemon
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators [keypad icon] Brian E Carpenter
- [88attendees] permanently out of scope Leif Johansson
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Tony Hansen
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Toerless Eckert
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Warren Kumari
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Warren Kumari
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Marc Erickson
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators joel jaeggli
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Dave Thaler
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ted Lemon
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Ralph Droms
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Scott Brim
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Yi Yang (yiya)
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators John Scudder
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Tim Chown
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Marc Blanchet
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Adam Roach
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ondřej Surý
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Franck Martin
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Adam Roach
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Carsten Bormann
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Nat Sakimura
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Eric McMurry
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Xiaohong Deng