IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr> Sun, 03 November 2013 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7D411E80E9 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JSy30Lhqc-qC for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB8211E8290 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id A5EC83B6F9; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 02:31:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E9066F00B73; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 19:31:14 -0700
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer+ietf@nic.fr>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Message-ID: <20131103023114.GA1777@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <CAAFAkD_g_VdmOKOvWAGif-eXF-ve3TpYWMexwC0rVSucW_4x7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAFAkD_g_VdmOKOvWAGif-eXF-ve3TpYWMexwC0rVSucW_4x7Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: 88attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list." <88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 02:31:57 -0000

On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 05:44:37PM -0400,
 Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> wrote 
 a message of 9 lines which said:

> Feels like overzelous, most optimal ever protocol design at
> the expense of usability.

Two interesting discussions:

http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/96278/elevator-algorithm-and-implementation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elevator_paradox

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email