Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators
joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Sun, 03 November 2013 00:26 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B413511E80F7 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-J6Qjfh4u8K for
<88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A1921E8128 for
<88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-bc20.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bc20.meeting.ietf.org
[31.133.188.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4)
with ESMTP id rA30QBJJ064849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128
verify=NOT); Sun, 3 Nov 2013 00:26:13 GMT (envelope-from joelja@gmail.com)
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_CE0EA6E8-E5D1-4A41-92F5-1231479B2BB9";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1311021722340.27100@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:26:04 -0700
Message-Id: <B278E6E6-D41E-4D9A-8E5A-6F8E28F15144@gmail.com>
References: <CAAFAkD_g_VdmOKOvWAGif-eXF-ve3TpYWMexwC0rVSucW_4x7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<52757340.5040507@gmail.com>
<alpine.OSX.2.01.1311021722340.27100@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
(nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, 88attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>,
<mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>,
<mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:26:37 -0000
On Nov 2, 2013, at 5:23 PM, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> wrote: > > We could of course make this the Code Sprint challenge for the week: > fix the damn elevators! > the elevators are fine, it’s the people. > Or not.... :-) > > Ole > > > Ole J. Jacobsen > Editor and Publisher > Home: +1 415-550-9427 > Cell: +1 415-370-4628 > E-mail: olejacobsen@me.com > URL: http://organdemo.info > Skype: organdemo > > > On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > >> On 11/2/2013 4:44 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >>> Feels like overzelous, most optimal ever protocol design at >>> the expense of usability. >> >> We either need to come more often or less often - when I checked in, I >> realized I had no idea how the elevators worked at previous check-in times, >> but had to ask, because I couldn't remember this time, either :-) >> >> But I usually acclimate by Wednesday or Thursday of IETF weeks ... >> >> Spencer >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 88attendees mailing list >> 88attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees >> > _______________________________________________ > 88attendees mailing list > 88attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees
- [88attendees] hotel elevators Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Leif Johansson
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ted Lemon
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Colin Doyle
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Leif Johansson
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ted Lemon
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators [keypad icon] Brian E Carpenter
- [88attendees] permanently out of scope Leif Johansson
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Tony Hansen
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Toerless Eckert
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Warren Kumari
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Warren Kumari
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Marc Erickson
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators joel jaeggli
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Dave Thaler
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ted Lemon
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Ralph Droms
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Scott Brim
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Yi Yang (yiya)
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators John Scudder
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Tim Chown
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Marc Blanchet
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Adam Roach
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Ondřej Surý
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Franck Martin
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Adam Roach
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Carsten Bormann
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Nat Sakimura
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [88attendees] hotel elevators Eric McMurry
- Re: [88attendees] permanently out of scope Xiaohong Deng