IETF Logo Mail Archive

[88attendees] permanently out of scope

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Sat, 02 November 2013 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACAF21E80C3 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wOt+w6JVQ+nH for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FB621E80A3 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.sunet.se (smtp1.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::214]) by e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id rA2Mv1Bh021423 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 23:57:01 +0100
Received: from kerio.sunet.se (kerio.sunet.se [192.36.171.210]) by smtp1.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA2Mut4Q017351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 23:56:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Footer: c3VuZXQuc2U=
Received: from [31.133.152.76] ([31.133.152.76]) (authenticated user leifj@sunet.se) by kerio.sunet.se (Kerio Connect 8.1.2) (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)); Sat, 2 Nov 2013 23:56:55 +0100
Message-ID: <52758334.2050808@sunet.se>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 23:56:52 +0100
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <CAAFAkD_g_VdmOKOvWAGif-eXF-ve3TpYWMexwC0rVSucW_4x7Q@mail.gmail.com> <210B3E60-59F9-4994-8DD9-ADFD033B8699@fugue.com> <52757567.8030100@sunet.se> <CDDD4F56-9C9D-45D2-92FC-9C21A9EBBF9E@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CDDD4F56-9C9D-45D2-92FC-9C21A9EBBF9E@fugue.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, sunet-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=192.36.171.210; country=SE; latitude=62.0000; longitude=15.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=62.0000,15.0000&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-sunet-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 09KIKV1gN - 67b028b58a90 - 20131102
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
Cc: 88attendees@ietf.org
Subject: [88attendees] permanently out of scope
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list." <88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:57:19 -0000

On 11/02/2013 11:22 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote:
>> Good initiative Ted :-) Lets expand the list of exhausted topics for the
>> good of the community:
> I really think it's best to keep a tight focus.   I agree that cookies are in scope, because they are always in scope.   But Japanese toilets are something we can deal with when we get to Yokohama.   The state of the art will probably have changed by then anyway.
>
I doubt it. They didn't replace the elevators in Vancouver did they? No
reason to expect a change in lavatory technology for Yokohama. I'm just
thinking ahead :-)

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email