Re: [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attendees
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5ED2B11E8196 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.203,
BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEq3THZpG-Iv for
<88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net
[IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C794121E80C4 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58])
(authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
r9U1Su9L063458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:28:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1310292108390.22256@joyce.lan>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:28:55 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <393B64E1-A134-4C1A-AE72-6ED6F857EC29@nostrum.com>
References: <mailman.7391.1383067717.3485.88attendees@ietf.org>
<30562.1383094457@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1310292108390.22256@joyce.lan>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 173.172.146.58 is authenticated by a
trusted mechanism)
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, 88attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attendees
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>,
<mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>,
<mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:29:01 -0000
On Oct 29, 2013, at 8:24 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > Someone was asking whether you have to pay the $5 airport surcharge if you have a one-zone paper ticket and need to upgrade it to two zones to get from the airport to downtown. I poked around on the Translink web site and the answer is no, you just pay the usual $1.25 upgrade. What a deal. Do I read correctly that you don't even need the upgrade on nights and weekends? I imagine most of us will come in on the weekend, and many will depart on the following one. Thanks! Ben.
- [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attendees Michael Richardson
- Re: [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attend… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attend… John R Levine
- Re: [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attend… Ben Campbell
- Re: [88attendees] transit tickets, from 84 attend… John R Levine