Re: [88attendees] Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFE011E818C; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:44:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEjX5dNbgWbX; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:44:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A5711E80EC; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maildlpprd53.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd53.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.157]) by mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id rA5Di24v029379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:44:03 -0500
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com rA5Di24v029379
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1383659043; bh=qRWTAZDsQ15dq9d4UoPXhQv3jHk=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=INZa8cYFqapXOByWRX8QGlFH3xbwzHRLvGHwFM3GUprM9EMdxOomZHMQHiRFs6ho6 cmmCAW3wO9K519B2f9cyyk/fhLLpfAFtj0+eT6Fsp056XJJtzWcpTVwtnUrv5kmiM2 kbctprykqmb0TK2v106+kGZYT/N6WkLFyuBoxNT4=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com rA5Di24v029379
Received: from mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.22]) by maildlpprd53.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:43:42 -0500
Received: from mxhub27.corp.emc.com (mxhub27.corp.emc.com [10.254.110.183]) by mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id rA5Dhfbu000774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:43:42 -0500
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.239]) by mxhub27.corp.emc.com ([10.254.110.183]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:43:42 -0500
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "88attendees@ietf.org" <88attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:43:40 -0500
Thread-Topic: [88attendees] Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson
Thread-Index: Ac7aLLeYlOz9d4JZTDGeK+AHvV4YKgAADdKg
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712026AAEBD0B@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
References: <211BE376-9766-4024-9443-304336C6C14D@ietf.org> <5B327ED3-D756-421D-AA1A-62DF0057243C@cdt.org> <5FB59788-EB16-479B-AE4F-F7FAEDE1403A@netapp.com> <8275E813-BD3A-48EB-B7D1-9D638AC7A25E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8275E813-BD3A-48EB-B7D1-9D638AC7A25E@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd04.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [88attendees] Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list." <88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:44:08 -0000

> We are writing to thank the IESG and others who were involved for establishing
> an anti-harassment policy for the IETF. We support the policy, the IESG's
> authority to issue such a policy, and the creation of the ombudsperson role.
> Having a confidant with whom to discuss harassment will be most welcome and it
> is our hope that by establishing this policy, incidents of harassment at IETF
> meetings will be reduced in the future.

Another +1

Thanks,
--David