Re: [89attendees] temperature in rooms Re: When does the IETF network officially come up?

Keith Mitchell <keith@dns-oarc.net> Sun, 02 March 2014 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <keith@dns-oarc.net>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CA31A0C46 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 02:14:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24fBm9vHOVgx for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 02:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dns-oarc.net (in1.dns-oarc.net [149.20.58.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD311A0C1C for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 02:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zen-keith.smoti.org (dhcp-b07d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.176.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dns-oarc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB590BDF25; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keith@dns-oarc.net)
Message-ID: <53130496.2050806@dns-oarc.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 05:14:46 -0500
From: Keith Mitchell <keith@dns-oarc.net>
Organization: OARC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 89attendees@ietf.org
References: <CACbUdyqLQFT8y+w0mMynceLrYFyXpT7oPZYZnApJGOcYHk+Q9g@mail.gmail.com> <6C1E7012-198E-41B5-BC0A-0D89307CB6A8@isoc.org> <9AD8EDB5-DA02-4956-9AB4-FF965CFA714E@isc.org> <9B214294-5B21-43A5-9E1F-08B6630323F1@cisco.com> <p06240602cf3790386cf9@dhcp-5432.meeting.ietf.org> <7108CB28-3F79-4265-8FC3-8076FC918416@cisco.com> <CACB24MuG23BN4RP-Lq5z5fnub44m9SqPTWZs0dVhMse=0ovZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> <EDFFFBDE-24CE-45E0-8226-767042EC8BC8@orandom.net> <CAC6JZKR_PnqSOzWtAv7PRvWu65ZqdFftsXTkSsYcjP4Nm9p4dw@mail.gmail.com> <m2eh2lez00.wl%randy@psg.com> <20140302094345.GC3482@crankycanuck.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20140302094345.GC3482@crankycanuck.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/0B7ZfArWx1N5ADFbOkRZyCbATNs
Subject: Re: [89attendees] temperature in rooms Re: When does the IETF network officially come up?
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 10:14:53 -0000

Welcome to British air-conditioning :-)

On 03/02/2014 04:43 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> First, I want to congratulate Randy on managing to raise the
> temp-in-rooms question this time before we even entered a meeting
> room!  But, I may have a tip (subject to whether your room controls
> are like mine.  I gather the wings and tower are a maze of twisty
> little passages, all different.)
> 
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:22:23AM +0000, Randy Bush wrote:
>>   o hard to get the room cool enough
> 
> I found my room stiflingly hot when I came in, but I discovered that
> the controls on the wall are supposed to be sensitive to whether
> anyone is in the room.  It turns out that there's a button on the
> thermostat that tells it "ignore the sensor", and then any input to
> the local control is ignored in favour of some other setting (which is
> apparently "solar load is fine").  On my control, it looks like a
> little person in a box.  If your eyes are better than mine, you may be
> able to see the corresponding icon on the LCD readout.  It looks like
> a Schrödinger box to me.