IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [89attendees] When does the IETF network officially come up?

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E48A1A028B for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:36:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NVmPcs0UUKjm for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E411A027C for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s241aK4J012287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:36:21 GMT
Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s241aI3f007259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:36:19 GMT
Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s241aI5q015999; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 01:36:18 GMT
Received: from [130.129.159.48] (/130.129.159.48) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:36:18 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <97BB5D24-4559-4640-A56B-3ADEBAEBDAF0@juniper.net> <69A9E91B-B466-4558-AB18-FC63F7A246D7@icloud.com> <171DD9F8-8B95-4212-BF6C-E7D5108F04F3@isc.org> <95EA75A4-77C6-4C57-B260-104725FC1816@gmail.com> <3C547F33-84C7-41E8-AAB7-705B38CB22D9@fugue.com>
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <3C547F33-84C7-41E8-AAB7-705B38CB22D9@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <ECB9DE3A-D5B7-46F9-9C9A-3A1ED91C85E0@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:15:39 +0000
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B651)
X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/2X2Qg8RWGRedsK2P7FExxnFS08A
Cc: Jim Martin <jrmii@isc.org>, David Misell <david.misell@icloud.com>, "CCEO@bt.com" <CCEO@bt.com>, Jim Spring <jmspring@gmail.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] When does the IETF network officially come up?
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 01:36:49 -0000

Tower floor 7 has intermittent wifi (ietf-hotel) and when wifi is up it still doesn't work. 

Just an fyi. 

Phil

> On Mar 3, 2014, at 9:43, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 2, 2014, at 11:25 PM, Jim Spring <jmspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I understand the efforts, but the fact is that thet BT installation of APs covering guest rooms is woefully inadequate and I suspect would have the same behavior if the IETF was ongoing or not -- multiple people have pointed out "good" coverage outside the room, "adequate" near the door, and "inadequate" within the room itself.  I suspect this pattern would be maintained whether the conference was here or not -- I've seen this at 3-4 properties while traveling in the last several months.  Specifically for me, there is some interference (metal door, machinery in the hallway, who knows) that is causing interference
> 
> FWIW, before the massive influx, the network was actually working pretty well.   The IETF is known for testing hotel networks to failure and meltdown.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email