Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes?
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 19:04 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AA61A0390 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:04:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-ZSbZoozyrZ for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986C31A03A8 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nat64.meeting.ietf.org (unknown
[IPv6:2001:67c:1231:998:f5d5:f605:7e92:cbda]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix)
with ESMTPSA id 66101238029F; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 14:04:02 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAFAkD9r0k3A7VRhP-AnX37aVXu8rhCE4pPponiiN=0muza4kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:03:59 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6AA14ABC-E667-4978-95DF-0FB5C28807E6@fugue.com>
References: <CAAFAkD9r0k3A7VRhP-AnX37aVXu8rhCE4pPponiiN=0muza4kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/372cc3QUCyeaBxBunEVeq1oOiM4
Cc: 89attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes?
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:04:09 -0000
On Mar 3, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> wrote: > It seems to me we have a lot less mikes this time in the meeting rooms. > (This was my observation at Viscount and Sovereign). Yes, it's been a problem. And it has been cold in some of the meeting rooms.
- [89attendees] not enough mikes? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Ted Lemon
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alia Atlas
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alexa Morris
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alia Atlas
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Michael Richardson