Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulative Liars

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Sun, 02 March 2014 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7552B1A0CEE for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XEsMx74k_GaZ for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0206.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.206]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F101A0D5B for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-a-v6.meeting.ietf.org (2001:67c:370:176:b414:c94:5a5c:6c38) by BLUPR06MB227.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.191.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.888.9; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:01:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <p06240603cf38d90b8751@dhcp-5432.meeting.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 08:01:23 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <09EAFB7D-1922-47A8-B74B-096CEE6296D7@isoc.org>
References: <BF6B6D37-04DF-459A-9383-EE7675584F27@gmail.com> <p06240603cf38d90b8751@dhcp-5432.meeting.ietf.org>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:67c:370:176:b414:c94:5a5c:6c38]
X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPR04CA016.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.242.225.154) To BLUPR06MB227.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.191.147)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0138CD935C
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: =?us-ascii?Q?SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019001)(6009001)(428001)(24454002)(479174003?= =?us-ascii?Q?)(377454003)(51704005)(189002)(199002)(53834002)(87286001)(8?= =?us-ascii?Q?7266001)(57306001)(82746002)(15975445006)(83716003)(4396001)?= =?us-ascii?Q?(19580405001)(19580395003)(74366001)(87976001)(74662001)(833?= =?us-ascii?Q?22001)(50226001)(81686001)(81816001)(80976001)(85306002)(954?= =?us-ascii?Q?16001)(94946001)(88136002)(92566001)(92726001)(31966008)(931?= =?us-ascii?Q?36001)(74502001)(49866001)(47976001)(50986001)(47736001)(474?= =?us-ascii?Q?46002)(85852003)(83072002)(94316002)(93516002)(56816005)(863?= =?us-ascii?Q?62001)(93916002)(89996001)(90146001)(76786001)(76796001)(464?= =?us-ascii?Q?06003)(77156001)(77096001)(59766001)(76482001)(95666003)(543?= =?us-ascii?Q?16002)(56776001)(36756003)(62966002)(77982001)(74876001)(461?= =?us-ascii?Q?02001)(69226001)(65816001)(81542001)(81342001)(51856001)(800?= =?us-ascii?Q?22001)(50466002)(79102001)(53806001)(47776003)(23726002)(336?= =?us-ascii?Q?56001)(63696002)(74706001)(42186004)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:11?= =?us-ascii?Q?02; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB227; H:wireless-a-v6.meeting.ietf.org; ?= =?us-ascii?Q?CLIP:2001:67c:370:176:b414:c94:5a5c:6c38; FPR:9E0FF124.9FFEDD?= =?us-ascii?Q?09.1CD093AA.88E6DAE1.203D5; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:e?= =?us-ascii?Q?n; ?=
Received-SPF: None (: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/4-MbkFaeSJH2XVjcgsRhAT0O64g
Cc: Serge Manning <sergem913@gmail.com>, "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulative Liars
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:01:43 -0000

All;

The hotel is correcting the matter.

Ray


On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> wrote:

> At 10:25 AM +0000 3/2/14, Serge Manning wrote:
> 
>> I arrived Saturday morning 10AM. I had reserved a king non-smoking. They did not have any available at such an early hour. It would be available in the afternoon. OK, no problem.
>> 
>> They offered an immediately available smoking king which I wasn't too keen on. Well, at some hotels, I can manage in a smoking room. But not this one, it simply reeked of smoke. I told them that I would wait for the non-smoking. The guy said, well why don't you hang out in the smoking room for now and we will switch you in the afternoon. I told him that I absolutely must have a non-smoking room in the afternoon. He said "there will be plenty of rooms when people check out this afternoon. Don't worry."
>> 
>> I come back down in the afternoon (with a headache from the smoke smell) and saw another staffer. After a lot of waiting and her "checking with the manager", there are no non-smoking king rooms at all!  I told her the guy before said no problem. She said I booked thru a 3rd party for run of the house. I showed her my Hilton direct reservation with confirmed king non-smoking on my phone. At the end, all they could give my was a non-smoking twin bed room.
>> 
>> I don't expect to be outright lied to at a Hilton property. This is a disgrace. I hope we never come back to this hotel. I have to be careful when turning over in bed to make sure I don't fall out.
> 
> I suspect the problem is that you accepted the first agent's offer to stay in the smoking room for the morning, meaning you were checked in to it rather than being assigned a not-yet-read king non-smoking room.  Then, when you came down, all the kind non-smoking rooms had been allocated.  The agent who gave you the B.S. about a run-of-the-house room was just making stuff up -- it shouldn't matter if the first agent had un-assigned the smoking room and re-assigned you to a pending non-smoking king.
> 
> So, the first agent misled you, probably out of ignorance, and the second made stuff up to try and placate you.  You might ask to have a word with the duty manager.
> 
> -- 
> Randall Gellens
> Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
> -------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
> Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what value there may
> be in owning a piece thereof.                        --National Lampoon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees