Re: [89attendees] Ethernet jack in Hilton Rooms

Geoff Mulligan <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0D61A0091 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:08:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taMff_QXGuaw for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.coslabs.com (mail.coslabs.com [199.233.92.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429B41A0090 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.65.103] (unknown [130.129.65.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.coslabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4197C20648; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:08:22 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <53166AF9.5060100@mulligan.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:08:25 -0700
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <CAENEhNdODKvJ+Gsuffi_wKD6Gg3xwFA9ygJcZ2KAphA29qGJfg@mail.gmail.com> <D214230D-0FF2-455D-A556-BB596ED1BAAE@juniper.net> <p06240608cf3b6aa4c63c@dhcp-hotel-wired-84-32.meeting.ietf.org> <3EE41CB8-44E2-46BA-98CC-BB2E5CE78E00@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <3EE41CB8-44E2-46BA-98CC-BB2E5CE78E00@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/4aFwfJyfSjxcLSMKZQ62NrhZPyw
Cc: Matt Lepinski <mlepinski@gmail.com>, 89attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Ethernet jack in Hilton Rooms
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:08:33 -0000

I really don't understand all of the complaints...

I just got here and as I said, I'm in the West Tower on the 12th floor 
in a nicely appointed room with a lovely view of buildings being 
constructed. I've got outlets galore (and most work), the ethernet jack 
works and the room seems just the right temperature. I found the IETF 
cookies - they were in one of the drawers (ok maybe just the crumbs).  
All the IETF Cokes were in my mini-fridge and I have a sink, clothes 
line, and an ironing board - who needs a laundry. I even think there is 
a bit-coin ATM in my closet.

Geoff



On 03/04/2014 07:17 AM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> At 9:29 PM +0000 3/3/14, John G. Scudder wrote:
>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Matt Lepinski <<mailto:mlepinski@gmail.com>mlepinski@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don't seem to have an Ethernet jack in my hotel room (Floor 5 of the Tower).
>>>>
>>>> I figured I should check with the list before giving up. If others have access to wired Internet in their rooms at the Hilton, then perhaps I am just being foolish and looking in the wrong place.
>>>>
>>> I had to look quite hard to find mine. It was hidden behind a solid part of the desk and obfuscated by a nest of other panels, messy cut coax cable ends, etc. The jack was also covered by a sliding cover plate (which is pretty common around here). Finally, I was fooled for some time by a decoy jack that had the hotel Ethernet wire plugged into it. The decoy was dead, the hidden jack worked.
>>>
>>> If you don't have a decoy jack and hotel-supplied cable in your room, though, I would think it bodes ill.
>> Was there small note of congratulations inside the cover of the hidden jack?
> There should've been, shouldn't there? But no. I found the tasty Internet goodness within to be sufficient recompense. And at least it wasn't in an unlit cellar with no stairs in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet in a disused lavatory with a sign on it saying "beware of the leopard".
>
> --John
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees