Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and Venue Preferences

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Sun, 09 March 2014 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608F91A0312 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gDNpsgzIHY52 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0142.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23041A030C for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.9] (86.3.37.162) by CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.166.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.893.10; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 05:55:42 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4A5E6F7D-3096-4A92-B221-529821949A74"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88174rRbqQdGLZ=eijSRyrVUra1ayiW9Bq7SNnbn2AGHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 00:55:24 -0500
Message-ID: <5CAE88B0-95EB-4F5F-8F33-8F6AE0D2269A@isoc.org>
References: <8D1ADA92-0551-49FD-A276-A4E0A135291E@isoc.org> <CADnDZ88174rRbqQdGLZ=eijSRyrVUra1ayiW9Bq7SNnbn2AGHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Originating-IP: [86.3.37.162]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DB4PR06CA006.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.152.36) To CO1PR06MB238.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.166.144)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0145758B1D
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019001)(6049001)(428001)(189002)(199002)(51704005)(377454003)(24454002)(92566001)(95666003)(31966008)(74662001)(63696002)(88136002)(81816001)(87976001)(15975445006)(81542001)(512934002)(94316002)(97186001)(83716003)(74876001)(74502001)(95416001)(84326002)(16236675002)(47446002)(94946001)(87286001)(97336001)(87266001)(85306002)(79102001)(36756003)(54316002)(56816005)(90146001)(89996001)(77156001)(77096001)(74366001)(42186004)(74706001)(83072002)(93516002)(66066001)(46102001)(65816001)(85852003)(93136001)(92726001)(59766001)(77982001)(80022001)(62966002)(47736001)(49866001)(83322001)(50226001)(80976001)(81342001)(71186001)(4396001)(82746002)(19580395003)(33656001)(47976001)(69226001)(76482001)(1411001)(81686001)(53806001)(86362001)(69556001)(51856001)(93916002)(50986001)(19580405001)(76796001)(76786001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR06MB238; H:[192.168.0.9]; CLIP:86.3.37.162; FPR:3CEBF1B4.3EB29FC9.F0DF13AB.48E85AFC.201F6; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (: isoc.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/6uWvP3gblwbv3xu8wWLoeVFrea8
Cc: attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and Venue Preferences
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 05:55:52 -0000

On Mar 8, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ray
> 
> I got one question with comments below, 
> 
> On Friday, March 7, 2014, Ray Pelletier wrote
> 
> Relating to the discussion on IETF venues we will soon be publishing a survey asking for your input for venues in Asia, Europe and North America.  In the 2010 Venue Preference Survey you said that Paris, London, and Berlin, were 1,2, and 3 for Europe and your attendance at these venues was the highest its been since IETF 63 - in Paris. 
> 
> So do you mean survey result of us answering was similar to attending in those cities and that the Paris was 1 with highest preference and highest attendance, then London then Berlin, as 2, and 3. 

Yes, it was.

> 
> 
>  We asked.  You told us.  We responded.  And you came. 
> 
> So the responding equaled the attending correctly. 

Somewhat surprisingly, yes.

Ray

>  
>  We will continue to be responsive.  We look forward to your input.
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> AB 
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees