Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAA31A0404 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:09:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lAXVgDA1zgHZ for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gro.dd.org (gro.dd.org [209.198.103.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8AF1A0471 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id 876373F464;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:08:53 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:08:53 -0500
From: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>
To: 89attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <7FCB0B3CF842034294E7FDBD59418BD266220C44@SFO-EXMB-03.silverspring\
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/7QZqi7PSlrdHwcGxkGbYhxWf0pE
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:09:00 -0000
References: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com> <p06240604cf3ca7d6d9a6@dhcp-a7b2.meeting.ietf.org> <5316FC2F.9000101@nostrum.com> <7FCB0B3CF842034294E7FDBD59418BD266220C44@SFO-EXMB-03.silverspringnet.c\ om> --text follows this line-- Thomas Herbst writes: > As a resident of the 9th floor of the tower, the biggest disappointment > has been the lack of a functional network. Ditto this on sixth floor of Tower. I'd be unlikely to write a bad public review for the hotel even though I'm not in the apparently delightful West wing. My room is basically fine; I haven't even touched the thermostat and the shower temperature has been fair enough. Trying to use the network from my room, even pretty late at night (1am), has been terrible though. I have decent enough signal, but multi-second RTTs and 25%+ packet loss. When I get in at night and just want to take care of a few quick things online I find myself still struggling to get through them two hours later. For my remaining two nights here I think I'll just have to camp in the lounge right up until I'm ready to tuck in. And oh yeah, breakfast has been disappointing.
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex