Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulative Liars
Serge Manning <sergem913@gmail.com> Sun, 02 March 2014 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <sergem913@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 286241A09F4 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:15:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtMS7EGO2UT9 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:15:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
2923C1A09DE for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u57so424347wes.22 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:15:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to;
bh=oh3uaXnpGXqHqyde7Nz1CttYiGZ+v8vn+QkOuy0NGsk=;
b=N6Snr3lSLgq7PHIMVyR9FdsnipwdDhj0UiNr5n+u6H+8VbK6P40cqe28uhzJjHTt9q
gnoYITwkUSsvdS5P5mqsNcoxKCWB1dod8P4nt3gI+fllmw0AKQf0t+hHROENVTA956ef
/+y+7DBmvDAD+I/JmH0/92YqYBS3CIUvUvBI2WDGF8CZL3fg3xZOdMRgTxjMltdCyTlA
qEz2HQI5slzIgo93UzIhcyeMK4sRP4gV7gQJPaMRC3vvOWdAFH91OTpZErlYjgFT/OJ5
T/YJ97hY5lh+ppYfY1ZK9uVnSHQz61slIZCLYi8MXLn5txvewEU1Qp9eQRBpOKicRW3M LY6g==
X-Received: by 10.180.97.37 with SMTP id dx5mr10958371wib.53.1393787700942;
Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:5d0e:8176:1751:a6dd?
([2001:67c:370:176:5d0e:8176:1751:a6dd]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
lz3sm26346303wic.1.2014.03.02.11.14.59 for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:14:59 -0800 (PST)
References: <BF6B6D37-04DF-459A-9383-EE7675584F27@gmail.com>
<p06240603cf38d90b8751@dhcp-5432.meeting.ietf.org>
<09EAFB7D-1922-47A8-B74B-096CEE6296D7@isoc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <09EAFB7D-1922-47A8-B74B-096CEE6296D7@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EA1F7D81-5A9E-49F0-B24E-48E6E1D61137@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B651)
From: Serge Manning <sergem913@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:15:00 +0000
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/B0zja4Ag2J2nClXi3EFv9Kgs6Ag
Cc: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com>,
"89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulative Liars
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:15:06 -0000
All, The hotel has now corrected the situation and even shifted me to a larger king non-smoking room for my remaining nights for the inconvenience. I guess I had some bad luck yesterday. Glad to know its not the hotel's routine mode of operation. --Serge > On Mar 2, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> wrote: > > All; > > The hotel is correcting the matter. > > Ray > > >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qualcomm.com> wrote: >> >> At 10:25 AM +0000 3/2/14, Serge Manning wrote: >> >>> I arrived Saturday morning 10AM. I had reserved a king non-smoking. They did not have any available at such an early hour. It would be available in the afternoon. OK, no problem. >>> >>> They offered an immediately available smoking king which I wasn't too keen on. Well, at some hotels, I can manage in a smoking room. But not this one, it simply reeked of smoke. I told them that I would wait for the non-smoking. The guy said, well why don't you hang out in the smoking room for now and we will switch you in the afternoon. I told him that I absolutely must have a non-smoking room in the afternoon. He said "there will be plenty of rooms when people check out this afternoon. Don't worry." >>> >>> I come back down in the afternoon (with a headache from the smoke smell) and saw another staffer. After a lot of waiting and her "checking with the manager", there are no non-smoking king rooms at all! I told her the guy before said no problem. She said I booked thru a 3rd party for run of the house. I showed her my Hilton direct reservation with confirmed king non-smoking on my phone. At the end, all they could give my was a non-smoking twin bed room. >>> >>> I don't expect to be outright lied to at a Hilton property. This is a disgrace. I hope we never come back to this hotel. I have to be careful when turning over in bed to make sure I don't fall out. >> >> I suspect the problem is that you accepted the first agent's offer to stay in the smoking room for the morning, meaning you were checked in to it rather than being assigned a not-yet-read king non-smoking room. Then, when you came down, all the kind non-smoking rooms had been allocated. The agent who gave you the B.S. about a run-of-the-house room was just making stuff up -- it shouldn't matter if the first agent had un-assigned the smoking room and re-assigned you to a pending non-smoking king. >> >> So, the first agent misled you, probably out of ignorance, and the second made stuff up to try and placate you. You might ask to have a word with the duty manager. >> >> -- >> Randall Gellens >> Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only >> -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- >> Go placidly amid the noise and waste, and remember what value there may >> be in owning a piece thereof. --National Lampoon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 89attendees mailing list >> 89attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees >
- [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulative … Serge Manning
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Randy Bush
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Mishra, Sanjay
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff very help… Stefan Winter
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Serge Manning
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Ross Callon
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… SAYKO, ROBERT J
- Re: [89attendees] [eX-bulk] : Re: Hilton check-in… Christopher LILJENSTOLPE
- Re: [89attendees] [eX-bulk] : Re: Hilton check-in… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [89attendees] [eX-bulk] : Re: Hilton check-in… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] Hilton check-in staff Manipulat… Randall Gellens