Re: [89attendees] thanks to the meeting organization

t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> Sun, 09 March 2014 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45521A023D for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 03:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyi_Gmqj0dC4 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 03:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lp0013.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D6F1A0344 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 03:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DB3PRD0710HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.255.75.36) by AMSPR07MB035.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.81.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.893.10; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 10:16:30 +0000
Received: from pc6 (86.159.89.250) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.255.75.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.423.0; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 10:16:29 +0000
Message-ID: <00b101cf3b7f$e45cb500$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <531A0E0B.2030301@gmail.com> <5164.1394289857@sandelman.ca> <973F26CF-335E-4B90-8625-776B77C671D1@isoc.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 09:45:28 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [86.159.89.250]
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0145758B1D
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: =?Windows-1252?Q?SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(189002)(2445400?= =?Windows-1252?Q?2)(199002)(13464003)(51704005)(377454003)(51914003)(4471?= =?Windows-1252?Q?6002)(62236002)(77096001)(83322001)(76786001)(63696002)(?= =?Windows-1252?Q?79102001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(50466002)(81542001)(?= =?Windows-1252?Q?23746002)(95666003)(80022001)(61296002)(65816001)(477760?= =?Windows-1252?Q?03)(80976001)(77156001)(74502001)(51856001)(62966002)(76?= =?Windows-1252?Q?796001)(33646001)(47446002)(59766001)(87266001)(76482001?= =?Windows-1252?Q?)(74706001)(81342001)(90146001)(50986001)(74366001)(9313?= =?Windows-1252?Q?6001)(88136002)(85852003)(46102001)(84392001)(69226001)(?= =?Windows-1252?Q?4396001)(50226001)(53806001)(86362001)(93516002)(9272600?= =?Windows-1252?Q?1)(87286001)(92566001)(14496001)(74876001)(15975445006)(?= =?Windows-1252?Q?97186001)(74662001)(66066001)(94946001)(77982001)(479760?= =?Windows-1252?Q?01)(87936001)(56776001)(93916002)(89996001)(85306002)(54?= =?Windows-1252?Q?316002)(44736004)(95416001)(49866001)(56816005)(83072002?= =?Windows-1252?Q?)(97336001)(94316002)(47736001)(31966008)(74416001)(7726?= =?Windows-1252?Q?001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR07MB035; H:DB3PRD07?= =?Windows-1252?Q?10HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:86.159.89.250; FPR?= =?Windows-1252?Q?:C6EEFDF7.9ABAA7E4.B3F76567.48BAF09B.2037E; PTR:InfoNoRec?= =?Windows-1252?Q?ords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en; ?=
Received-SPF: None (: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/CFaDoJXhk-vMl_l5vkKv-oDl7ss
Cc: 89attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [89attendees] thanks to the meeting organization
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 10:16:50 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Pelletier" <rpelletier@isoc.org>
To: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: <89attendees@ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 7:41 AM
On Mar 8, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

> Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In particular, although the rooms were in a maze, I was amazed how
>> everybody at the IETF Registration Desk knew precisely where every
>> other room was, and guided me precisely.  Never has anyone pointed me
>> to the map, they just knew - thanks.
>
> Ray, should we wind up in a hotel with a maze, I suggest that we have
a
> scanvenger hunt just after the reception on Sunday.  That way, many
people
> will have visited each of the rooms before they have to find the new
room
> with 10 minutes to spare.

Interesting idea.
>
> Also I realized that one advantage of the whole "Regency A,B,C,D,E"
naming
> scheme is that if you've been to "A", you likely can find "B" pretty
easily,
> vs Viscount/Sovereign/Monarchy Suite name isn't obviously related…

So true.

<tp>

I disagree; all you need is a 101 in the British aristocracy and it all
becomes clear:-)

What did throw me, and I saw many others thrown as well, was the
reference to 3rd Lower Ground.  Once found, I went through my Agenda and
tagged the sessions I planned to attend with W1, W3 and E-3 - also known
as hot, sultry and icy respectively - and had no problems thereafter.
YMMV.

Tom Petch

Not sure how to handle that one.  Maybe in a situation like this we
should add location identifiers,
West 1 (W1) Viscount.

>
> I did appreciate that the snacks were will distributed though,
> and the hallways were not congested (remembering a San Diego and
Orlando '98
> meeting..)

A logistical challenge for the staff and hotel, especially amounts and
replenishment, but they were pretty responsive.

Thanks for the feedback

Ray


>
> --
> Michael Richardson
> -on the road-
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees

_______________________________________________
89attendees mailing list
89attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees