Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm...
Derek Atkins <DAtkins@mocana.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 13:37 UTC
Return-Path: <DAtkins@mocana.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0411A015E for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:37:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TfejzXbzOiz1 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mocana.com (smtp.mocana.com
[IPv6:2001:470:8254:40:21d:92ff:fe68:1e6e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with
ESMTP id 85DB61A00FE for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:37:26 -0800 (PST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1393853842-01c788098d6c160001-OowX3S
Received: from email.mocana.com ([10.200.16.9]) by smtp.mocana.com with ESMTP
id N0qXroCVnS3lvONL (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 03 Mar 2014 05:37:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: DAtkins@mocana.com
Received: from yugi.mocana.local ([10.200.16.9]) by yugi.mocana.local
([10.200.16.9]) with mapi; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:37:22 -0800
From: Derek Atkins <DAtkins@mocana.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:37:21 -0800
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm...
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm...
Thread-Index: Ac825bR26OmA9rkxTeGmVW3sI6CF3Q==
Message-ID: <1393853841.30828.0.camel@localhost>
References: <5314853B.10804@sunet.se>
In-Reply-To: <5314853B.10804@sunet.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.200.16.9]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1393853842
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: RC4-MD5
X-Barracuda-URL: http://10.200.40.6:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at mocana.com
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0
QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2,
rules version 3.2.2.145695 Rule breakdown below pts
rule name description ---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/Cm2-Wlmp5FxXDWPkzSI14TkS38g
Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm...
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:37:27 -0000
I thought it was the global timeout for when a talk went over time? On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 05:35 -0800, Leif Johansson wrote: > its really an alarm that goes off whenever an IETFer gets lost somewhere > in the hotel > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
- [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Leif Johansson
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Derek Atkins
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Ted Lemon
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Cao,Zhen
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Eric McMurry
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [89attendees] its not a fire-alarm... Alexandru Petrescu