Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data for area
David Misell <david.misell@icloud.com> Sat, 01 March 2014 00:00 UTC
Return-Path: <david.misell@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB8A1A0363 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:00:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_51=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6,
J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kt7O_w79AHhc for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nk11p14im-asmtp002.me.com (nk11p14im-asmtp002.me.com
[17.158.72.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BCD1A0319 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown-b8-e8-56-34-a1-fc.home
(host86-145-66-0.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.66.0]) by
nk11p14im-asmtp002.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server
7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id
<0N1Q002IGDC9WP20@nk11p14im-asmtp002.mac.com> for 89attendees@ietf.org;
Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:00:13 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.87, 1.0.14,
0.0.0000 definitions=2014-02-28_05:2014-02-28, 2014-02-28,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1401130000 definitions=main-1402280149
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_71902E07-B697-467C-BF28-AED3EF0BE686"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: David Misell <david.misell@icloud.com>
In-reply-to: <20140228235852.6140052.34259.19849@bt.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:00:08 +0000
Message-id: <D6BC50DA-5F25-4CDC-BFF6-267E73BE7E71@icloud.com>
References: <084501cf3238$fc501da0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
<501B9B57358724489663DB2B30223B809FE53D8F7E@EMV66-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
<22910.1393347525@sandelman.ca>
<00ec01cf3251$34c99680$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
<CF36512C.56AC6%neil.mcrae@BT.COM>
<1C0F8DBE-5846-4F72-8966-31820125B05B@icloud.com>
<20140228235852.6140052.34259.19849@bt.com>
To: neil.mcrae@bt.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/Cy0mtpZn_pHjPbqa-3S3UvwS7_E
Cc: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>,
daedulus@btconnect.com
Subject: Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data for area
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:00:27 -0000
thanks neil, its just the Security Industrial Complex and US controls via the w3c and other mechanisms seem to have stymied development dave On 28 Feb 2014, at 23:58, neil.mcrae@bt.com wrote: > Don't think you can compare today's ability to deliver streaming traffic with 2001. > > Easy for us to be negative about history but I look back and think all of us working in our own trenches have changed the world irrevocably - i hope in a decade we can look back and have changed the world all over again. > > Neil > > > > From: David Misell > Sent: Friday, 28 February 2014 19:47 > To: McRae,N,Neil,TNE R > Cc: daedulus@btconnect.com; mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca; 89attendees@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data for area > > neil, > having watched september 11th on the BT martlesham futures network, sending my placement student to watch live feeds from New York, I knew at the time that we neded v6. v4 feeds could not handle the demand. Here we are 10+ years later, but now with Multipath IP and paranoid proxies used as taps all over the place, what went wrong! > > Kind Regards, > Dave > > David S. Misell MSc CISSP MBCS > +44 (0)7710 380044 > misell.dave (Skype) > > > On 28 Feb 2014, at 14:45, neil.mcrae@bt.com wrote: > > > > I think the V6 situation in the UK is far from ideal but the big 4 > > providers have been fighting it out on other more profitable fronts. > > > > Within the next 12 months I think the big 4 will all offer it. > > > > Regards, > > Neil. > > > >> On 25/02/2014 17:44, "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote: > >> > >> Yes, the question was too coy but was meant to be about the availability > >> of IPv6 at IETF89 over any form of network, my experience being that the > >> UK is a long way behind most countries in making IPv6 available. I > >> assumed that the IETF infrastructure would provide it, as it has done > >> for years, but wondered if it would have to be over an IPv4 tunnel:-( > >> > >> Tom Petch > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> > >> To: <89attendees@ietf.org> > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:58 PM > >> > >> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> 89attendees mailing list > >>> 89attendees@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> 89attendees mailing list > >> 89attendees@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 89attendees mailing list > > 89attendees@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
- [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area t.p.
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area neil.mcrae
- [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data … t.p.
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Mark Townsley
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Michael Richardson
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… t.p.
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Bill Fenner
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Jim Martin
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Clemens Schrimpe
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Ralph Droms
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Eggert, Lars
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Keith Mitchell
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Randy Bush
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Dick Franks
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Arran Cudbard-Bell