Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor)
Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 11:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9A61A0431 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:04:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pnz4y5Yy0QxG for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp129.ord.emailsrvr.com (smtp129.ord.emailsrvr.com
[173.203.6.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B877E1A0423 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
smtp29.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 35112108B0A;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:04:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp29.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 66AA8108AA2;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:04:48 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140305104908.GH9266@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:04:49 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <939F75B1-043D-44C4-8759-68072AB52A32@ogud.com>
References: <5316FC2F.9000101@nostrum.com>
<CF3CAD5D.4F93C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
<20140305104908.GH9266@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/D8yFDBwQXKKsPR7pOBnsacFBDe0
Cc: 89attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel needs to rated on
TripAdvisor)
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:04:54 -0000
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:37:38AM +0000, Rosen, Brian wrote: >> but the facilities are subpar, pretty much all around. About the only >> positive thing I can say for facilities is that the chairs in the meeting >> rooms are comfortable. > > This appears to illustrate how much one's experience varies. I find > these chairs among the least comfortable things I've ever tried to sit > upon. > I agree the chairs are real bad, my back is hurting after few minutes sitting in them Hotel is just as bad as it was last time and I'm glad I'm not staying here. Olafur
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex