Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips
Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 18:55 UTC
Return-Path: <aallen@blackberry.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id D182A1A0368 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:55:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J83KBHpnnglt for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-p01.blackberry.com (smtp-p01.blackberry.com
[208.65.78.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD021A0367 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:55:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xct103cnc.rim.net ([10.65.161.203]) by mhs210cnc.rim.net with
ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 03 Mar 2014 13:55:21 -0500
Received: from XCT111CNC.rim.net (10.65.161.211) by XCT103CNC.rim.net
(10.65.161.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:55:21 -0500
Received: from XMB122CNC.rim.net ([fe80::28c6:fa1c:91c6:2e23]) by
XCT111CNC.rim.net ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:55:21 -0500
From: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>, "Rosen,
Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>,
"89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] Fish and Chips
Thread-Index: AQHPNwIdE9UXaIZLgUWqyU42EJRMwJrP/CMA//+5sJA=
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:55:19 +0000
Message-ID: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD23398921CE@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
References: <CF3A1F54.36111%gwiley@verisign.com> <5314C46C.60902@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5314C46C.60902@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.160.251]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD23398921CEXMB122CNCrimnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/F0tRuj_LO-8_2w_qXubpUV90Gdg
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:55:32 -0000
Recommend Mickeys Fish bar on a street off the left about 4 blocks down Praed St (opposite the entrance to the hospital) and next to the Fountain Abbey Pub on the corner. From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:06 PM To: Wiley, Glen; Rosen, Brian; 89attendees@ietf.org Subject: Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips On 3/3/14 17:00, Wiley, Glen wrote: Not the restaurant named "fish and chips" a few blocks away…disappointing (but cheap). I had some impressively good Fish and Chips (and mushy peas) at a nearby pub called "Monkey Puzzle," although they appear to be quite busy in the evenings. The roasted pork belly there is also very, very nice. /a
- [89attendees] Fish and Chips Rosen, Brian
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Wiley, Glen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Colin Doyle
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Saikat Ray
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Wiley, Glen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Eggert, Lars
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Brian Weis
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Bill Mills
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Dave Cottlehuber
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Kostas Pentikousis
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Ross Callon
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips ietf
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Christian Hopps
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Livingood, Jason
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Franck Martin
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Marc Linsner (mlinsner)
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Stephen D. Strowes
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Randy Bush
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Ben Campbell