IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Wed, 05 March 2014 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133B41A0503 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:24:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdEC3vrbocJh for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E3B1A04E9 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s25BNlwr007628; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:23:47 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk s25BNlwr007628
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1394018627; bh=nk0E5xIq8xlj0fIdzl5ecuhGE4g=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=VSemdgHHnugdNrYbXd99cnkOplmUsyVHv4v50vlkGUg5K2uYPUIzKIHOvSv9d8Vlj SotdMwBZTUG9gFL8NAgp/AdaMGH+glKgstMPCnfBQikJt2bPNakEKI0vHhSdF1JDNG wjMrsTsUhcY+/qIIrhvUeQ+KMscznb6so4Dp7WUg=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id q24BNl0546011570qH ret-id none; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:23:47 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:160:80c:6829:e22a:e44e] ([IPv6:2001:67c:370:160:80c:6829:e22a:e44e]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s25BMMHv010017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:22:25 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:22:22 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|8de9b7a04643cbf78d76e2af4bb65b87q24BNl03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org> <10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=q24BNk054601157000; tid=q24BNl0546011570qH; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=2:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: s25BNlwr007628
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/JAbkCbNzhgyDHaoFmx96W3_3o1U
Cc: 89attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:24:01 -0000

On 5 Mar 2014, at 11:08, David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com> wrote:

> Thomas Herbst writes:
>> As a resident of the 9th floor of the tower, the biggest disappointment
>> has been the lack of a functional network.
> 
> Ditto this on sixth floor of Tower.  I'd be unlikely to write a bad
> public review for the hotel even though I'm not in the apparently
> delightful West wing.  My room is basically fine; I haven't even
> touched the thermostat and the shower temperature has been fair
> enough.

Hi,

Yes, the very poor WLAN in the hotel (as opposed to the very good one in IETF areas), combined with the lack of hot water (in tower floor 10 of hotel), means we’re missing a couple of rather desirable basics.

Tim

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email