Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 10:34 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 840731A039C for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:34:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9fiXvaJ2CdM0 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBD41A0391 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-bfe5.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bfe5.meeting.ietf.org
[31.133.191.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with
ESMTP id s25AYKEu096681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128
verify=NO);
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:34:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5316FC2F.9000101@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:34:20 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CACD3550-1474-43E9-88D4-4BF24242D64C@nostrum.com>
References: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com>
<p06240604cf3ca7d6d9a6@dhcp-a7b2.meeting.ietf.org>
<5316FC2F.9000101@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/Kf0-Xs8wji1y-SOYWvefB1b9um4
Cc: "Jethanandani, Mahesh" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>,
Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>,
"89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:34:32 -0000
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > Which is to say: I suspect the problem can't be fixed without a complete overhaul of the water heating system in the tower; and I surmise that this won't be done in the few days before I leave. My experience at hotels is that asking them to fix something that can't quickly be solved by one person with a wrench generally results in a punitive visit from maintenance staff who then fiddle with something until it breaks. (Caveat: My room is mostly okay (east wing.) and is consistent with John's previous comments ) But things like hot water are basic assumptions for a hotel room. It would be reasonable to ask for a room change, or compensation if the room change is not available. Perhaps if that happened often enough, they would prioritize said overhaul. OTOH, maybe I can sell hot water from my overheated tap ;-)
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex