Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 05 March 2014 11:08 UTC
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 821C51A046F for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:08:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ky5yYMvXGH2y for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6621A0404 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7A42C9C;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:08:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 702899A for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:08:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:08:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CF3CB293.21D50%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403051205272.747@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com> <CF3C35D6.9D6C%peter@akayla.com>
<CF3CB293.21D50%eckelcu@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-137064504-1401640428-1394017687=:747"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/LKEGOyBnXZfmU1fdJzUO_mpShv4
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:08:13 -0000
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote: > For what its worth, I’m in the east wing, and my room has been great. > Water is hot, AC works, room is quiet, and cleaning staff has always come > in timely fashion. I have found all hotel staff in reception and > restaurants to be very pleasant and helpful. > Oh, and elevators work exceptionally well :) Me too, I am on 5th floor at east wing. Water temp+pressure fine, room faces inwards overviewing the pool so noise level is good, I haven't felt the need to change the temperature at all, wired Internet works great (I have my own wifi AP/NAT box I bring so wifi in the room works great). -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex