IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [89attendees] Breakfast

enzagi@tcra.go.tz Thu, 06 March 2014 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <enzagi@tcra.go.tz>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6796D1A0100 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:40:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGBVaDpGZhra for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tcra.go.tz (mail.tcra.go.tz [41.188.170.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786211A00B4 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tcra.go.tz (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by mail.tcra.go.tz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BF16B3E801C; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:06:04 +0300 (EAT)
Received: from 31.133.167.162 (SquirrelMail authenticated user enzagi) by mail.tcra.go.tz with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:06:04 +0300
Message-ID: <5b37eee9daa3f199659cf9ec0061be67.squirrel@mail.tcra.go.tz>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCOk7wqvxptuoVYYgbOTtOYgqxUxQwQwHSfYPpSA+hjnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1C80CE2-FE4E-4F83-BACF-9D0C9D1B54C2@juniper.net> <CAL0qLwZWMj8E0W51gtVDoOmPE3YAupKVmM_MG3Dwvn5cnG7WyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCOk7wqvxptuoVYYgbOTtOYgqxUxQwQwHSfYPpSA+hjnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:06:04 +0300
From: enzagi@tcra.go.tz
To: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/MvwFxz62WR0ONQOHypUbBTo85VA
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Breakfast
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 20:40:34 -0000

IT IS DIFFERENT.I HAD BREAKFAST THERE YESTERDAY.

>> Someone at the first floor restaurant claimed the breakfast being
>> offered
>> upstairs is the same as what the restaurant offers.  This seems unlikely
>> to
>> me, but I didn't go look for myself.  Can anyone confirm one way or
>> another?
>
> It is absolutely not.  It's a subset.
>
> Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email