Re: [89attendees] When does the IETF network officially come up?

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Sun, 02 March 2014 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA631A0C13 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 23:57:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIwDHtodGSyE for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 23:56:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67481A0C0D for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 23:56:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=995; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393747015; x=1394956615; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=vkyYHsvcLBfj5vMK5r88NkIQegawQTyvJkoPajzuAOU=; b=K9Zk8F1JGaj2N2ofRSO9weaA+YzlR/tHS9JbdM3LqhvxLl5SRKxRlqSO vw734QMuPHC6y4/tHtsNRXGIBVi7E2HLeLJRCnstQla9v4VtTQkqxZEHX m9W+u+UyV+XzOKWjqPtMqz2mbnis1JKAG582LZ+JjGQo1TWzr7IeOXxjU 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFAAbkElOtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABXA4JlITtXwSGBEhZ0giUBAQEDAUkwEAIBCBguMiUCBA4Fh3EIActYF44mIxAHEYMTgRQEmDySK4Mtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,571,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="307441707"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2014 07:56:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s227ukqJ011012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 2 Mar 2014 07:56:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 01:56:45 -0600
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Dave Oran <daveoran@orandom.net>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] When does the IETF network officially come up?
Thread-Index: Ac81PqhBFgFPbBl7T+SLgUBoKoqZcgANzEKAAACrzwAAAGvjAP//qVUegABqzICAAAOrgIAAo9YAgAAagoCAAANpgIAAcIAA
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 07:56:44 +0000
Message-ID: <2495F7E9-9723-41C5-9E14-0E558DA76429@cisco.com>
References: <884C5283-E928-478B-922A-9B9347A41EDB@cisco.com> <CACbUdyqLQFT8y+w0mMynceLrYFyXpT7oPZYZnApJGOcYHk+Q9g@mail.gmail.com> <6C1E7012-198E-41B5-BC0A-0D89307CB6A8@isoc.org> <9AD8EDB5-DA02-4956-9AB4-FF965CFA714E@isc.org> <9B214294-5B21-43A5-9E1F-08B6630323F1@cisco.com> <p06240602cf3790386cf9@dhcp-5432.meeting.ietf.org> <7108CB28-3F79-4265-8FC3-8076FC918416@cisco.com> <CACB24MuG23BN4RP-Lq5z5fnub44m9SqPTWZs0dVhMse=0ovZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> <EDFFFBDE-24CE-45E0-8226-767042EC8BC8@orandom.net> <0F397CED-CD57-4C5E-B55B-5A0D9D737C69@orandom.net>
In-Reply-To: <0F397CED-CD57-4C5E-B55B-5A0D9D737C69@orandom.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.250.188]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <5E7DA3BFA08B2945B80D57E0C8B5F717@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/NltwZXSg9sCluCb817VL9RYGmNw
Cc: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>, Colin Doyle <cdoyle@verilan.com>, Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>, attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>, Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>, Jim Martin <jrmii@isc.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] When does the IETF network officially come up?
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 07:57:04 -0000

Did you check the wireless signal information? Could it be too much noise somewhere around your room? Cannot say anything about the wired connection.


On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:14 AM, David R Oran <daveoran@orandom.net> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 1:01 AM, David R Oran <daveoran@orandom.net> wrote:
> 
>> My room on the 4th floor has now also gone to s…
>> Can’t stay associated with the AP for more than 10 seconds at a time.
>> In some cases this is too little time to even get a DHCP IPv4 address.
>> 
> And when I do ping times go between 200ms and 5 Seconds, with loss of 37%. Thats on the ietf SSID
> 
> --- www.ietf.org ping statistics ---
> 125 packets transmitted, 78 packets received, 37.6% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 140.323/1480.633/5322.551/1536.355 ms
> 
> Time to have the NOC folks do the ritual totentanz with the hotel an BT people? Seems this is beginning to look it might be one of the problematic venues...