Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 18:05 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 535691A02C0 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:05:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s50t6oGOdQOO for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9005A1A023E for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-b459.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b459.meeting.ietf.org
[31.133.180.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with
ESMTP id s23I5X0m098160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA
bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:05:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <5314C46C.60902@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:05:32 +0000
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>, "Rosen,
Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>,
"89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
References: <CF3A1F54.36111%gwiley@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF3A1F54.36111%gwiley@verisign.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------070506040208060108030807"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/QqsZp4Prsq3T3i24gU1_3369kg4
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:05:40 -0000
On 3/3/14 17:00, Wiley, Glen wrote: > Not the restaurant named "fish and chips" a few blocks > away…disappointing (but cheap). I had some impressively good Fish and Chips (and mushy peas) at a nearby pub called "Monkey Puzzle," although they appear to be quite busy in the evenings. The roasted pork belly there is also very, very nice. /a
- [89attendees] Fish and Chips Rosen, Brian
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Wiley, Glen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Colin Doyle
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Saikat Ray
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Wiley, Glen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Eggert, Lars
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Brian Weis
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Bill Mills
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Dave Cottlehuber
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Kostas Pentikousis
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Ross Callon
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips ietf
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Christian Hopps
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Livingood, Jason
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Franck Martin
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Marc Linsner (mlinsner)
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Stephen D. Strowes
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Randy Bush
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Andrew Allen
- Re: [89attendees] Fish and Chips Ben Campbell