Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-(
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 09:24 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 358241A01C2 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 01:24:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVR7KNPInFNa for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 01:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6121D1A00F2 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 01:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-bfe5.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bfe5.meeting.ietf.org
[31.133.191.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with
ESMTP id s259Nx82090117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128
verify=NO);
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:24:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <A4BAAB326B17CE40B45830B745F70F1046FE9DAC@VOEXM17W.internal.vodafone.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:23:58 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <895B930B-5266-41C2-8D0E-071AA4D47B1B@nostrum.com>
References: <53167430.1050007@alum.mit.edu>
<A4BAAB326B17CE40B45830B745F70F1046FE9DAC@VOEXM17W.internal.vodafone.com>
To: "Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group" <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/UcmrpK3gu2afcR5I__vdmJawGOc
Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>,
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-(
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:24:16 -0000
I haven't tried the IETF breakfast, so I can't comment. But I seem to recall last time here (I may be wrong as that was a long time ago), they fed us in the restaurant all week, and that it was at least okay. I wonder why they changed? Most hotels seem to get better at handling the IETF over multiple visits. I guess 13 years is too long between reinforcements :-) On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com> wrote: >> But this is England, so I should expect it. :-) > > No, it's an international hotel chain, which IME have no bearing on any country's cuisine whatsoever. Happy to point out several quality fry-ups nearby if you're interested. > > Cheers :) > Kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: 05 March 2014 00:48 > To: 89attendees@ietf.org > Subject: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( > > On Saturday and Sunday the breakfast was down on the first floor in the restaurant. It was (relatively) fine. (Well - OK.) > > Now that we are having breakfast on the 3rd floor - not so good. > > My most major complaint is that for two days straight the scrambled eggs have been stone cold. And today I was the first person to get any out of a new delivery from the kitchen! Cold scrambled eggs - Yum! > > Also, the selection seems to be notably deficient from what was available on the weekend. There are no soft boiled eggs, no waffles, no pancakes. (That is just what I noticed.) > > Even at its best, this breakfast doesn't begin to compare to what we have had many/most other places. But this is England, so I should expect it. :-) > > Bah Humbug! > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
- [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [89attendees] Best breakfast in london Simpso… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Tom Pusateri
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Dave Cottlehuber
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Robert Cragie
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] Cold breakfast :-( David Misell