Re: [89attendees] Name tags

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505961A01DF; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:27:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ICvDfJ2X5LlN; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from egssmtp02.att.com (egssmtp02.att.com [144.160.128.166]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8141A01DA; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp02.att.com ( egs 8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s26IQrXa019252; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:26:53 -0800
Received: from vpn-135-70-98-134.vpn.swst.att.com ([135.70.98.134]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140306182652gw100j0c4je>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:26:52 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.98.134]
Message-ID: <5318BDEB.4040307@att.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:26:51 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
References: <59279077-F1C0-4854-AE4D-D7E63187C4ED@edvina.net> <CADnDZ899tVbzCHWxVyFO9yUcaOSLyuvhDAToQhPmB7V12n66uw@mail.gmail.com> <55cc86973be8472ebb54dee1fe1eeb0f@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <55cc86973be8472ebb54dee1fe1eeb0f@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060907090506050706000307"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/Wh7iacYIZzVRs5KcaNcIZfTcU_8
Cc: The IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Name tags
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:27:01 -0000

On 3/6/14, 1:18 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
>
> It also helps if the names are visible, and not obliterated by other 
> items placed in front of the names (such as the micro-schedule).
>

Most of the name tags are on an elongated card that is folded in half to 
form the two sides. I was talking with a first-timer whose name *was* 
covered by a micro-schedule, and I suggested that he put it inside 
between the two halves. Unfortunately, HIS name tag was printed two 
sided on a smaller card, so there was NO way to slide the micro-schedule 
in between. I'm hoping that this is not going to be the norm for the 
future, as I consider it an unintended consequence that would be 
unfortunate.

     Tony Hansen