Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and Venue Preferences
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 09 March 2014 03:40 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CADB1A0295 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:40:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbAGeVfojnf8 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x234.google.com (mail-yh0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
00CD31A014D for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a41so5864170yho.11 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 19:39:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=wWn2X6oz8gdNWMdtNPWT+I9MS8jqB2dWJB7HaCZo0lo=;
b=jDg2q2fqZY0aYhPpRdVfR5kDBbm2L8ZpZN+TtimhP3y45DByjRNGvOJavwAzvMKDBy
vEQGG/T03/cvQ2U+Lj4vLV+aw+nxY3MFIRs1GmY/JADunvjDbRpiDWGjGpUWc2tZ6FIM
GlWoT5jaJ6wWVb7i3fK47j1X0k1fha8j2CN+tLMUjA39cB/XTkTZSSDfQdgL/sVaCiS8
7CtA1xWgDSh3ZABNO3gtH485YQ7j+vsF6daDKHF/Iv4oQiPnoM5cfOWW4mgaxohqV1yG
eT+WylDqAMUXPkXBjai4/daoJPVxVHsBFmVDfinvvdMQESEYQR7HYj/k/Z5uM1hsnWvN vd2Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.24.196 with SMTP id x44mr1880825yhx.92.1394336394047;
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 19:39:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.202.7 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 19:39:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8D1ADA92-0551-49FD-A276-A4E0A135291E@isoc.org>
References: <8D1ADA92-0551-49FD-A276-A4E0A135291E@isoc.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 03:39:53 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88174rRbqQdGLZ=eijSRyrVUra1ayiW9Bq7SNnbn2AGHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122a26e7705a804f4243d44
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/YgZ74Etrx4uZBJsY8gPLft-75i4
Subject: Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and Venue Preferences
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 03:40:00 -0000
Hi Ray I got one question with comments below, On Friday, March 7, 2014, Ray Pelletier wrote Relating to the discussion on IETF venues we will soon be publishing a > survey asking for your input for venues in Asia, Europe and North America. > In the 2010 Venue Preference Survey you said that Paris, London, and > Berlin, were 1,2, and 3 for Europe and your attendance at these venues was > the highest its been since IETF 63 - in Paris. So do you mean survey result of us answering was similar to attending in those cities and that the Paris was 1 with highest preference and highest attendance, then London then Berlin, as 2, and 3. We asked. You told us. We responded. And you came. So the responding equaled the attending correctly. > We will continue to be responsive. We look forward to your input. Thanks. AB
- Re: [89attendees] Future Meeting Info and Venue P… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [89attendees] Future Meeting Info and Venue P… Derek Atkins
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Stefan Winter
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Philip Matthews
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Michael Richardson
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Ray Pelletier
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Arran Cudbard-Bell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Ted Lemon
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Ted Lemon
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] [89all] Future Meeting Info and… Carsten Bormann