Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 11:21 UTC
Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B01B1A0503 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:21:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huW_lZ1V60If for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx12.unify.com (mx12.unify.com [62.134.46.10]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEA81A0452 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 03:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.235]) by
mx12.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id EA86023F04CE for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:21:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.208]) by
MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.235]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:21:14 +0100
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
To: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
Thread-Index: AQHPOGNLwl9GYUhIFE619tunOOgoeprSVkSA
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:21:13 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17D24EDB@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <7FCB0B3CF842034294E7FDBD59418BD266220C44@SFO-EXMB-03.silverspring\
<21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org>
In-Reply-To: <21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/YuKt8f2rgA27CedYD9G3erww_lk
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:21:20 -0000
On arrival I was given a room on the sixth floor of the east wing and there were a number of issues with my room including no hot water, low pressure, single beds, power sockets not working etc. I complained and the next day was given a room on the 4th floor of the same wing and I have no problems with this room which has lots of very hot water, separate shower, working sockets etc. I was also given a bottle of wine as compensation. I was initially told the hot water issues was a failure of the boiler and was an issue for the whole hotel. This I don't believe to be true. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > David C Lawrence > Sent: 05 March 2014 11:09 > To: 89attendees@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor > > References: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com> > <p06240604cf3ca7d6d9a6@dhcp-a7b2.meeting.ietf.org> > <5316FC2F.9000101@nostrum.com> > <7FCB0B3CF842034294E7FDBD59418BD266220C44@SFO-EXMB- > 03.silverspringnet.c\ > om> > --text follows this line-- > Thomas Herbst writes: > > As a resident of the 9th floor of the tower, the biggest > disappointment > > has been the lack of a functional network. > > Ditto this on sixth floor of Tower. I'd be unlikely to write a bad > public review for the hotel even though I'm not in the apparently > delightful West wing. My room is basically fine; I haven't even > touched the thermostat and the shower temperature has been fair > enough. > > Trying to use the network from my room, even pretty late at night > (1am), has been terrible though. I have decent enough signal, but > multi-second RTTs and 25%+ packet loss. When I get in at night and > just want to take care of a few quick things online I find myself > still struggling to get through them two hours later. For my > remaining two nights here I think I'll just have to camp in the lounge > right up until I'm ready to tuck in. > > And oh yeah, breakfast has been disappointing. > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex