Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes?
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 20:15 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 960481A03B8 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:15:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pegcu2_luaOw for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
1CB7E1A00B6 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so11789797ykt.4 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:15:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type; bh=0nc8gJqm7M1Rpx6anUQZt5sNcBCLxwSyyq5hA1FhgU0=;
b=d4wEhkc8D72jATDsQeaV2D+DmSAhmXrftJOu94bzKzJkX1RbqKmMMvn4Fao1u3ZZra
ylY7n+AIq3rbowF150Xpj4gEObNkXbYK1g5oQC85R0OaI5GQ6H6nnSTtdTPoov1Wqlcp
12vVwYk186GiAHSWwbGO8p9MlcLZgm3fg5KihNT4l7xGQ8bH+SbSCGry9pa/aAPeXo1Q
ndhhZzYFFP1N0N0Bn0r+O+q689UBqqioixn2EA96mGmm3ayCwlBbyakNjlGEbE0v8Lfx
TN8Alj3zJJyPQaV66Tl2FtQ2yFmT5gFMmeuywOGk5gjdw7gkn75qtoT1VvgZ89H4OQxg Huzw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.120.102 with SMTP id o66mr3220141yhh.99.1393877753906;
Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.194.69 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.194.69 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:15:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <55498A99-8DD5-4A80-939F-A409ED175DE1@amsl.com>
References: <CAAFAkD9r0k3A7VRhP-AnX37aVXu8rhCE4pPponiiN=0muza4kg@mail.gmail.com>
<6AA14ABC-E667-4978-95DF-0FB5C28807E6@fugue.com>
<CAG4d1re4RLnT3EB66KdYDLPq=BVuAOVe44FrxqsNhyPOkgB9ow@mail.gmail.com>
<55498A99-8DD5-4A80-939F-A409ED175DE1@amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:15:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re=poDTFn5YLRMwDz8DFCzf6xtG2W6_GTKjmGH0LuSm-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300e55eb61d1ce04f3b97485
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/aMyeZ8D5boEqZ2Md64yoi31BBTk
Cc: 89attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes?
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:16:00 -0000
Alexa, Thank you very much! I know temperature is hard to adjust with variable numbers of people in the rooms too. Alia On Mar 3, 2014 8:00 PM, "Alexa Morris" <amorris@amsl.com> wrote: > Interestingly, we actually have the same number of microphones in the > rooms as we typically do and, in fact, at the plenary we have six where we > normally have four. We are going to leave the two extra microphones in > these rooms for the remainder of the week (a total of three in Sovereign, > and a total of three in Viscount). The other meeting rooms are also > configured as usual, with one microphone in the small rooms and two in the > larger rooms. If this configuration is no longer sufficient, perhaps it can > be adjusted. > > As for the cold, it's definitely noticeable in the front of the plenary > room. The room behind the stage is used to set up for events that need > larger staging; there is access to the outside via a large loading elevator > and as result the temperature is harder to control. For the rest of the > week, we will adjust the heat in these rooms in an attempt to a compensate > for the lack of insulation. > > Alexa > > On Mar 3, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Agreed - very cold in several. It was colder in sfc than it was walking > outside to lunch. > > Alia > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 3, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> wrote: >> > It seems to me we have a lot less mikes this time in the meeting rooms. >> > (This was my observation at Viscount and Sovereign). >> >> Yes, it's been a problem. And it has been cold in some of the meeting >> rooms. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 89attendees mailing list >> 89attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees >> > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > > > ---------- > Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF > 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 > Phone: +1.510.492.4089 / Fax: +1.510.492.4001 > Email: amorris@amsl.com > > Managed by Association Management Solutions (AMS) > Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning > www.amsl.com <http://www.amsl.com/> > >
- [89attendees] not enough mikes? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Ted Lemon
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alia Atlas
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alexa Morris
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alia Atlas
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Michael Richardson