Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 10:04 UTC
Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 790781A0200 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYjAQQ75sC7V for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa09-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net
(p3plsmtpa09-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.233]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D6F1A01C2 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.182.142] ([31.133.182.142]) by
p3plsmtpa09-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id Zm3v1n00B34kqeP01m3zr6;
Wed, 05 Mar 2014 03:04:01 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 02:03:54 -0800
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: "Jethanandani, Mahesh" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>,
"89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CF3C35D6.9D6C%peter@akayla.com>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
References: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/bWLZ-yR0D8joUJhW93MAMUnjltk
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:04:07 -0000
Perhaps this is an issue of which wing you are staying in? I¹m in the West Wing and my water is more than hot when needed (albeit not very highly pressurized), my room was made up before 8:45 this morning (and most every morning), and pretty much everything works. I¹ve stayed in the West Wing before to good effect, but have no experience with the Tower or East Wing. Certainly, you should be posting your experience to TripAdvisor, but I don¹t know if that factors into the decision on which hotel to use for future meetings. -Peter On 3/5/14, 1:53 AM, "Jethanandani, Mahesh" <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote: >Stewart Bryant asked the question in the elevator - who is having to >take showers with cold water. At least half if not more said they were. >That is after I have had problems with the room being very hot, with >sink getting clogged and the room not getting cleaned till late in the >evening. > >I am not even discussing breakfast. > >I want to start a petition to post your experience of this hotel on >TripAdvisor. > >-- >Mahesh Jethanandani >mjethanandani@gmail.com > >_______________________________________________ >89attendees mailing list >89attendees@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees >
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex