Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data for area
Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com> Sat, 01 March 2014 01:03 UTC
Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEC51A0330 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:03:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KCx1h8UmRVH4 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
20E121A0296 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c41so1604654yho.13 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:03:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type; bh=DtX4aIP2we4gbOQ3ZTgVsdnenRXysLkKgnZ9U7VfRLo=;
b=afu9YJPT7nhSBm6azZIQMv5440dUIggfLawUVlLYMfAIK+q7Hlxc8u31io72rAvyIb
0daui2pq5EXOJvx4fJIvW+mhHiS2Kc+bcCI8QSXCHpTr6HmoIkr2CI00BczE20Ij1+O7
xRNCAeqXVDUz2O9/ZYPMvaxNH9micixh4ZT1rtm1XCpvjuyIzWN0RxJA6GzYILgJVufL
qweHukny9tKnvgHxs/lq6+vcijo6BSXuKb/BiKSzE0PH9AnaQmP6bwvuUmfMyI6xWeAn
B3tPZ7T51Gh98Ctowd72wmOH5obkY6RLb8ioIXhD7dp6PXMJEXkfvh7Nx9Buojku/ntJ ECWA==
X-Received: by 10.236.85.112 with SMTP id t76mr5205848yhe.74.1393635809834;
Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:03:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.154.68 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:03:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CF36512C.56AC6%neil.mcrae@BT.COM>
References: <084501cf3238$fc501da0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
<501B9B57358724489663DB2B30223B809FE53D8F7E@EMV66-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
<22910.1393347525@sandelman.ca>
<00ec01cf3251$34c99680$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
<CF36512C.56AC6%neil.mcrae@BT.COM>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 01:03:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri5oArqNNZf-awhM6uZsCeW2YDCpTL7h+Vs4eRAu9HtM2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: neil.mcrae@bt.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300e526d643bba04f3811ff0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/doGGnwisi1QkpgcDuoS2EINiLNA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:53:59 -0800
Cc: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, 89attendees@ietf.org, daedulus@btconnect.com
Subject: Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data for area
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 01:03:34 -0000
Neil, Is 12 months a realistic timeframe for IPv6 on BT domestic links? Tunnels are such a pain when IP address changes every few weeks. Or do I need to hasten things along by moving from BT to an ISP that will? If you have any influence, please use it; the natives are growing restless Dick Franks ________________________ On 28 February 2014 14:45, <neil.mcrae@bt.com> wrote: > I think the V6 situation in the UK is far from ideal but the big 4 > providers have been fighting it out on other more profitable fronts. > > Within the next 12 months I think the big 4 will all offer it. > > Regards, > Neil. > > On 25/02/2014 17:44, "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote: > > >Yes, the question was too coy but was meant to be about the availability > >of IPv6 at IETF89 over any form of network, my experience being that the > >UK is a long way behind most countries in making IPv6 available. I > >assumed that the IETF infrastructure would provide it, as it has done > >for years, but wondered if it would have to be over an IPv4 tunnel:-( > > > >Tom Petch > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> > >To: <89attendees@ietf.org> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:58 PM > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> 89attendees mailing list > >> 89attendees@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >89attendees mailing list > >89attendees@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees >
- [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area t.p.
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area neil.mcrae
- [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+data … t.p.
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Mark Townsley
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Michael Richardson
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… t.p.
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Bill Fenner
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Jim Martin
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Clemens Schrimpe
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Ralph Droms
- Re: [89attendees] best prepaid phone+data for area Eggert, Lars
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Keith Mitchell
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… neil.mcrae
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… David Misell
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Randy Bush
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Dick Franks
- Re: [89attendees] IPv6 was : best prepaid phone+d… Arran Cudbard-Bell