Re: [89attendees] Enjoying the almost-every-meeting hotel grpe-fest

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCF51A021D for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:41:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRKHym7_LLah for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:41:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4F61A0699 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id lj1so1167851pab.6 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 06:41:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yjBXlzKL2i3ykm9LwdtRxzdYgSI4xYgpSLZpzWEThFc=; b=Hqc1MlUAYk4RqvLLna+Byx7QgpVYm7t31BB23hgmdnQycTSrCAbmFK09Jnlebr/vnx gBW8S079ybloEjJEdK/DW0syomaBOEaApsKd1fsscHgvpHAae3l/lsdV1GF4lmdZgBQo xIMwLFpflx5XFDSbz/thh79pTmJzyRe5WAMmxdKHKfKhMDjaU02Y8Psr8w1sKvAwE053 1vSpYNRcjwYzAoE+p4Xn2OO0fTbijVzcubR1hABVHO555DBocISRoCh5hZbTIVY+dra5 zUaM3YHake97QRggrr8Lxid5ZvDLa7OVBngD2PiynGCBSmuj6seABsxoEaBpmyHnypU/ SbLw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.60.225 with SMTP id k1mr7527823pbr.58.1394030464784; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 06:41:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.220.102 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:41:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <80447F14851DE3A97A28683B@JCK-EEE10>
References: <80447F14851DE3A97A28683B@JCK-EEE10>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:41:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbjyu9HMdoNwbwF0B74HL5dRTA6dQX84gmZg4oqhNtNGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec544eef2a8e14504f3dd028e
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/fOnqvXhocKToMe0CkQVpE4X4qFg
Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Enjoying the almost-every-meeting hotel grpe-fest
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:41:16 -0000

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:35 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

> Purely IMO, anyone who is complaining multiple times on this
> list who has not had a serious conversation with hotel
> management (not just front desk staff) about realistic solutions
> and alternatives is less serious about having problems addressed
> than they are about the joys of the complaining process.
>
> Once we solve harassment and diversity problems perhaps we can
> go to work on whining.  :-(
>
>
I have to say that every time I register, it takes me a while to decide
whether to click on the "Yes, I want to be on the meeting attendees list".
The decision gets harder each time; I don't want to miss some key
announcements from the Secretariat or IETF management, or from people with
good local knowledge.  But in the vast majority of cases, once I'm at the
hotel, the list is effectively noise to me, and it seems to be trending
toward more noise rather than less.

Do we perhaps need a separate per-meeting list where people can do their
write-only complaining?

-MSK