Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 12:36 UTC
Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3091A0433 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:36:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYaBJOZ1fup8 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
E3A071A041A for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:36:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q107so2755411qgd.1 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:36:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type; bh=Ag32rS9hLCWTBgQvy4pu9wxUbafmX5LwL3C02qzXf7c=;
b=FXoMZeBvSmYrf0Hln5KjP8uYPm49tTBTA4gEegKB0vNHFfwtIHNznfz0NQFhs5+WRz
RYIFsGl/QYLJuDZIZK2fQ0/i+lGidZSe/GzSHB5kZgj3oNNHx95XPwqOnayNlfO9DeTa
zUH0UWyGUniPRRuv6rkFC2vy0seBWp4VDeWC38pJZUE/MIpnlED3rsAl0pgC1cLB6zsb
ToVDfqgdhEutgWTRAj4kyK2k8XJKEdSg6lj4oENclbVB2TVcF010h+/YWM+hKiTEN19u
+MoDvAZ9J+fBEgr/7ayZk/k3zeZZoiQ9RombxyT77vln21kMB6t3XgK3Bs3MKULJY8tp 1KAg==
X-Received: by 10.224.45.197 with SMTP id g5mr6335494qaf.52.1394022984198;
Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:36:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.27.20 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:36:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2a1d65ad-95b5-4c9e-9522-c70e9f7220df@email.android.com>
References: <21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org>
<10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
<EMEW3|8de9b7a04643cbf78d76e2af4bb65b87q24BNl03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
<2a1d65ad-95b5-4c9e-9522-c70e9f7220df@email.android.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:36:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFU7BATiGs0zBM9=3HsUjECOxvR_xNfnZcxdLdBsUCxJAHao=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/hFYI5omxWEb_SVJ4T4ARxwZUapk
Cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>,
"89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:36:29 -0000
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net> wrote: > IETF turning RIPE.... ! You are right. The last time I had the similar issues (cold room, no hot water, sometimes *no water at all*) was at RIPE in Dublin..:)) > On 5 March 2014 11:22:22 GMT+00:00, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On 5 Mar 2014, at 11:08, David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com> wrote: >> >>> Thomas Herbst writes: >>>> >>>> As a resident of the 9th floor of the tower, the biggest disappointment >>>> has been the lack of a functional network. >>> >>> >>> Ditto this on sixth floor of Tower. I'd be unlikely to write a bad >>> public review for the hotel even though I'm not in the apparently >>> delightful West wing. My room is basically fine; I haven't even >>> touched the thermostat and the shower temperature has been fair >>> enough. >> >> >> Hi, >> >> Yes, the very poor WLAN in the hotel (as opposed to the very good one in >> IETF areas), combined with the lack of hot water (in tower floor 10 >> of >> hotel), means we're missing a couple of rather desirable basics. >> >> Tim >> >> ________________________________ >> >> 89attendees mailing list >> 89attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > 89attendees mailing list > 89attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees > -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex