IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4360C1A03BB for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:06:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.147
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qx7Z3O2i7M8F for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3D01A03BA for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1WL8iq-000Aa0-RP; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 05:06:44 -0500
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 05:06:44 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "Jethanandani, Mahesh" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, 89attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <B0D3FF5AA27511B05F19DF2B@JCK-EEE10>
In-Reply-To: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com>
References: <5316F415.3010107@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/kdOd2DUGHGraMtnPCobE5e-1WD4
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:06:50 -0000

--On Wednesday, 05 March, 2014 01:53 -0800 "Jethanandani,
Mahesh" <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stewart Bryant asked the question in the elevator - who is
> having to take showers with cold water. At least half if not
> more said they were.

The difficulty is that such surveys are most often answered by
those who are disgruntled and who have the time to read the long
threads of complaining on this (and every other) meeting list.  

It seems that room issues differ among the three towers/wings
and maybe by floor or finer granularity within them.  I've got
hot water, working and readily accessible wired Ethernet.  I
don't have as much water pressures as I'd like and prefer real
thermostats to a knob that effectively says "more" and "less",
but have no serious complaints.  Those of you who are, by the
luck of the draw, having serious problems have my sympathy, but
I don't think a conclusion that all of us, or even a majority of
us, are unhappy is justified.

   john

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email