Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good
"Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com> Fri, 07 March 2014 12:36 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id BA37C1A01E0 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:36:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-fMtZOPN96V for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rozanak.com (mail.rozanak.com
[IPv6:2a01:238:42ad:1500:aa19:4238:e48f:61cf]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 760CA1A01C9 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E132523E2D59 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:36:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rozanak.com
Received: from mail.rozanak.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.iknowlaws.de
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UmAub6oPR41e for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:36:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kopoli (g226181060.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.226.181.60]) (using
TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate
requested) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E636623E2D58 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:36:16 +0100 (CET)
From: "Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com>
To: <89attendees@ietf.org>
References: <CAHBU6iuT5x02LTzM84yC9Ena=b35uKrA=kZn=ZrFZm2kXeDtBw@mail.gmail.com>
<006d01cf3a01$42f674a0$c8e35de0$@rozanak.com>
In-Reply-To: <006d01cf3a01$42f674a0$c8e35de0$@rozanak.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:36:12 +0100
Message-ID: <007801cf3a01$d37d8270$7a788750$@rozanak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0079_01CF3A0A.354CE6F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQG9DMhlFc6jeH1W8v+5loZg3hC4UwH5WE+XmuoegnA=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/mFgQhhTDyRa8SRDDmh6GNL2BoSA
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:36:33 -0000
Just a far suggestion It would be good that there was possibility like a classroom that the remote participant could really talk (raise their hands and the jabber scripter gives him/her permission for microphone) and talk. Then I guess the remote participant wasn’t something different than the real participant Of course it is just a wild idea.. and needs infrastructure and works… Thanks for all jabber scripter, all organizers, all people who helped the remote participant to feel like they are there. Hosnieh From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hosnieh Rafiee Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:32 PM To: 'Tim Bray' Cc: 89attendees@ietf.org Subject: Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good +1 I also liked it. It was a new experience…but one needs to get use to it since the way of talking is only writing in a jabber… and you have to be a fast typist :-) to send your message in a time it is replayed … From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:14 PM To: 89attendees@ietf Subject: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good I had to leave early and take part in a WG meeting via Meetecho/Jabber and hey, it worked pretty well. –T
- [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Rosen, Brian
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … joel jaeggli
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Alexa Morris
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Hosnieh Rafiee