IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [89attendees] whining

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105821A0192 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:55:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLFTKb-rTbat for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60141A0166 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:54:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3139; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1393894496; x=1395104096; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=s85Kngfl0GocW0+OOkqeCDzcPVPc0WoHTXnWsGNSxyw=; b=JHuCr1jyc36eUaTWj2mWU6B223Srs6+p/bSOriFaTeH7U+RvgIbkrOtF YUsJHbHCE8/4eETH2ztlnvAGDGDAYhFTbYF8mW8212hy3Ym0L2HenQ+Y8 53HF3k6dWQbPQnGvse4cxrDR6IZVA/Lhyrxz65YL0jJ8MxOIt4zopp/7Q c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYFAOYjFVOQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABagwY7iTe3ME+BIBZ0giUBAQEEAQEBawoBEAsEFAkWCAcJAwIBAgEVHxEGAQwBBQIBAYd1DcwqEwSOWQeEOASYPIZKi2GDLTw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,582,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="2264726"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2014 00:54:54 +0000
Received: from [10.61.81.213] (ams3-vpn-dhcp4566.cisco.com [10.61.81.213]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s240srMr020525; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:54:53 GMT
Message-ID: <5315245D.7010904@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:54:53 +0000
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
References: <CF3A9588.49CB4%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <52852309-C9AE-40F2-8FC4-3C4DEFFA9464@fugue.com> <CAP4=VcjitWY78TuSumDK4tA7=wcchMYGB+dYi3pww-hn3JQznw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP4=VcjitWY78TuSumDK4tA7=wcchMYGB+dYi3pww-hn3JQznw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080108040309070105060207"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/oSK_D9M0tX7R7B67KQ1sbosSXUI
Cc: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>, "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] whining
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list." <89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>, <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:55:00 -0000

On top of the drinks, I would add some cookies :-)

B.
>
> I think it should be a standing rule that we all buy drinks for the 
> secretariat anytime we see them at the bar. Its the least we can do to 
> compensate for our high-maintenance whining behaviors. :)
> Cheers,
> -Benson
>
> On Mar 3, 2014 9:39 PM, "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com 
> <mailto:mellon@fugue.com>> wrote:
> > In general when we whine, it's because we imagine that there is some 
> thing that can still be changed, not because we are mad at the 
> secretariat.   I really hope that they don't take it personally; if 
> they do, they should feel free to pie me, because I would deserve it. 
>   It's a hard job, particularly with people like us as end-users.
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 89attendees mailing list
> 89attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email