[89attendees] not enough mikes?
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> Mon, 03 March 2014 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4841A00A5 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:01:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08Q2ZojtXpRq for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:01:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com
[209.85.220.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E48F1A0079 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:01:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id if11so3573307vcb.8 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type; bh=Vfq90aBQq5RkjGDS22Y4BsD7SeAq9HJiXxtvsBOpX28=;
b=iRQELCIIIL6HAqpsGV2XzfXPfnOT91LxEjzuxhcFxvbb24yV+tG65CYdMb97vDAQMT
0bj1XNQi+6KgyaxqFI8QVxKz9AU8c10DlrJiLnmeMTbe7gPSqFSlGdZnLkTl6WvEuyhP
/30BL9Ex+fBiCDTHI1NW4nCmIu7QLD2wFldLOdqIZjmRG2lsqqpIi/2+b5HY5Pxuu3zV
mFzCameaQjJmFC+aHSZgvqXgMbKXadXZmVLvb7PO91gZweN6WceMB83Y//c7XLx1Lnw1
K+R8FYW77ymE1y5S9UkEr/B0Ao0vUTMWukbw4fMVC10VewIND15ykyDYtdNT5JcOq4a+ ZV+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/QQzXm7FudN9xmLNJG/kFBIuKiq5QqE3oRXoI/2LUC3ul5mdBio3Sp/UWvoazG2rDTUta
X-Received: by 10.52.157.8 with SMTP id wi8mr34420vdb.46.1393858906198;
Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:01:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.2.196 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 07:01:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 10:01:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAFAkD9r0k3A7VRhP-AnX37aVXu8rhCE4pPponiiN=0muza4kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: 89attendees <89attendees@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/qENwDKPyyXDDIlTgx3WhRTbSnLg
Subject: [89attendees] not enough mikes?
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:01:50 -0000
Since nobody is whining about the temperature in the meeting rooms - I feel need to start another controversy. It seems to me we have a lot less mikes this time in the meeting rooms. (This was my observation at Viscount and Sovereign). cheers, jamal
- [89attendees] not enough mikes? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Ted Lemon
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alia Atlas
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alexa Morris
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Alia Atlas
- Re: [89attendees] not enough mikes? Michael Richardson